Stokes v. Stokes
246 Ga. 765, 273 S.E.2d 169, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 1267 (1980)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A trial court in a divorce proceeding has the authority to equitably apportion property acquired during the marriage between the parties, regardless of which spouse holds the legal title. This power of "equitable division" is an incident of divorce and alimony proceedings and is distinct from awards of alimony, partition, trust, or fraud.
Facts:
- Guy Edgar Stokes and Joyce Jones Stokes were married for over twenty years.
- During the marriage, they accumulated property, including a house and lot at 450 Pinetree Drive.
- The wife's father had initially deeded the property to the husband.
- The husband later deeded the property to his wife, placing the title solely in her name.
- The husband alleged that the purchase money and all mortgage payments for the house were furnished by the joint efforts of both parties.
Procedural Posture:
- On October 24, 1978, Guy Edgar Stokes (husband) filed for divorce against Joyce Jones Stokes (wife) in a Georgia trial court.
- On December 15, 1978, the trial court granted a final judgment and decree of divorce, reserving all other issues, including alimony, for future determination.
- On February 2, 1979, the husband amended his complaint to allege the house was held in trust and prayed for an equitable division of the property.
- The case proceeded to a jury trial on the reserved issues.
- The jury denied alimony to the wife but awarded a one-fourth interest in the real property to the husband.
- The wife (appellant) filed an application to appeal the trial court's judgment, which the Supreme Court of Georgia granted.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a Georgia court, in a divorce proceeding, have the authority to equitably divide real property titled in the name of one spouse and award a portion to the other spouse, even when the award is not based on alimony, partition, trust, or fraud?
Opinions:
Majority - Per curiam
Yes. A court hearing a divorce case has the authority to award to one spouse real property titled in the name of the other spouse based on the principle of equitable division. The court reasoned that Georgia statutes (Code §§ 30-105, 30-118) contemplate the “division of property” in divorce cases, and this power is an ancillary jurisdiction of a court handling divorce and alimony. Reviewing a line of cases including Bragg v. Bragg and Coleman v. Coleman, the court found it had previously approved awards of both real and personal property held in one spouse's name, not as alimony, but as a “property division.” This decision solidifies the doctrine of equitable division of property, overruling prior contrary holdings in Byrd v. Byrd and Hargrett v. Hargrett.
Dissenting - Bowles, Justice
No. A court cannot award one spouse's titled property to the other spouse outside of established legal theories like alimony, trust, or partitioning of jointly owned property. The majority is legislating from the bench by creating a new theory of property rights that did not previously exist. The cases relied upon by the majority are distinguishable, as they involved either awards of alimony in kind, recognition of pre-existing ownership rights, or partitioning of jointly held property. This new doctrine of 'equitable division' undermines Georgia's status as a separate property state (Code Ann. § 53-502) and creates uncertainty in property law by allowing a jury to reallocate titled property without a clear legal basis.
Concurring - Hill, Justice
Yes. The court's authority to equitably divide property is rooted in the equitable nature of divorce and alimony proceedings. The concurrence agrees with the majority's conclusion but writes separately to propose a uniform, three-step framework for juries to apply. This framework would involve: 1) assigning each spouse their separate property (pre-marital or inherited); 2) equitably apportioning the 'marriage property' acquired during the marriage based on a list of factors; and 3) separately determining if an award of permanent alimony is appropriate. This structured approach would bring much-needed clarity and consistency to the application of the equitable division doctrine.
Analysis:
This landmark decision formally establishes the doctrine of 'equitable division of property' in Georgia divorce law, clarifying that a spouse's contributions can create an equitable interest in property even if it is legally titled in the other spouse's name. The ruling moves Georgia family law away from a strict title-based system toward a more flexible approach that recognizes marriage as a shared enterprise. This precedent empowers trial courts to achieve fairer property distributions by looking beyond legal title to the substance of the parties' respective contributions, aligning Georgia with the modern trend in family law across the country.
