Stew-Mc Development, Inc. v. Fischer
770 N.W.2d 839 (2009)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The scope of an easement for ingress and egress is limited by the intent of the parties at the time of its creation; a proposed change in the use of the dominant estate from agricultural access to access for a major residential development constitutes an impermissible new burden, not a mere increase in use.
Facts:
- In 1888, Anton Birkel purchased land, and his descendant, Ferdinand Birkel, later allowed relatives to cross his property on a path known as 'Kress Lane' to access their northern farm.
- After the northern property was sold to non-family members and eventually divided into two parcels, Ferdinand and his successor, Louis Birkel, continued to permit the new owners to use Kress Lane for farm access.
- In 1983, Louis Birkel sold his property, which Kress Lane crosses, to Nancy and Thomas Fischer. The owners of the two northern farms, including James Kress and the Schmitts, continued to use the lane for access.
- No formal, written easement for Kress Lane was ever executed or recorded, and the lane was never dedicated as a public road.
- In 2002, Stew-Mc Development, Inc. made an offer to purchase the Kress farm, contingent on rezoning the property for a single-family residential development.
- Nancy Fischer objected at a county zoning meeting, asserting that the northern landowners possessed only a limited access easement. The rezoning application was ultimately denied due to lack of sufficient public access.
- An agent for the developers, John Herrig, allegedly told Nancy Fischer that if she obstructed the rezoning, the Fischers would be taken to court, which would be a great financial burden, and later told Thomas Fischer the matter would get 'costly and ugly'.
Procedural Posture:
- Kress and Stew-Mc Development first sued Dubuque County in district court for a declaratory judgment that Kress Lane was a public road; the Fischers intervened as defendants.
- The district court granted summary judgment for the Fischers, ruling Kress Lane was a private road based on an easement.
- The Iowa Court of Appeals, an intermediate appellate court, affirmed the district court's judgment.
- Stew-Mc Development then filed a new lawsuit in district court against the Fischers, seeking a declaratory judgment for an unlimited easement and alleging other torts.
- The Fischers filed a counterclaim against the plaintiffs for abuse of process.
- The district court granted summary judgment to the Fischers on most of the plaintiffs' claims and later denied the plaintiffs' request for a declaratory judgment, finding the proposed residential development would exceed the easement's scope.
- After a bench trial on the remaining counterclaim, the district court ruled against the Fischers on their abuse-of-process claim.
- The Schmitts (plaintiffs and appellants) appealed the district court’s ruling on the easement's scope to the Iowa Supreme Court. The Fischers (defendants and appellees) cross-appealed the dismissal of their abuse-of-process claim.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does changing the use of an easement from providing access to two farm properties to providing access for a major residential development constitute an impermissible expansion of the easement's scope when such a use was not contemplated at the time the easement was created?
Opinions:
Majority - Appel, J.
No. A mere increase in the frequency of use of an easement for ingress and egress is permissible, but a change in the character of the use that was not within the contemplation of the original parties is not. The original purpose of the easement over Kress Lane was to provide agricultural and residential access to two farm properties. Changing this use to serve a major residential development is a fundamental change in character, not merely an increase in traffic, and imposes a new burden on the servient estate that could not have been intended when the easement was created. The court also affirmed the dismissal of the Fischers' abuse-of-process claim, finding substantial evidence that the plaintiffs' primary purpose in filing the lawsuit was the legitimate goal of establishing their legal rights under the easement, rather than an improper motive to harass or intimidate the Fischers.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the traditional property law principle that the scope of an implied or prescriptive easement is determined by the intent of the original parties and the historical use of the servitude. The court clearly distinguishes between a permissible increase in the frequency of use and an impermissible change in the character of use. This ruling establishes a significant precedent in Iowa, protecting servient landowners from unforeseen and dramatic expansions of easements when the dominant estate is converted to a much more intensive use, such as from agricultural land to a residential subdivision.
Unlock the full brief for Stew-Mc Development, Inc. v. Fischer