State v. Sims
162 W. Va. 212, 248 S.E.2d 834 (1978)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under West Virginia's felony-murder rule, an unintentional or accidental killing that occurs during the commission of, or attempt to commit, one of the enumerated felonies (arson, rape, robbery, or burglary) constitutes first-degree murder. The state is not required to prove malice, premeditation, or a specific intent to kill.
Facts:
- Paul Sims, along with two accomplices, went to the home of Oscar and Mrs. Schmidt with the intent to commit a burglary.
- After cutting the telephone wires, Sims, armed with a sawed-off shotgun, and an accomplice went onto the front porch.
- The accomplice broke a window and entered the Schmidts' bedroom, while Sims pointed his shotgun and a flashlight into the room from the porch.
- Walter Schmidt, the homeowners' son, entered the bedroom, causing a distraction.
- During the distraction, Oscar Schmidt grabbed his pistol and shot Paul Sims in the right arm.
- Sims claimed the gunshot wound caused an involuntary muscle spasm in his trigger finger, resulting in the discharge of his shotgun.
- The shotgun blast killed Walter Schmidt.
- A neurologist who treated Sims stated in a deposition that it was possible for the wound to have caused such an involuntary reflex.
Procedural Posture:
- The State of West Virginia charged Paul Sims with first-degree murder in the Circuit Court of Brooke County, the trial court.
- Prior to trial, the court ruled in limine that Sims' defense of an accidental discharge of his weapon was not a valid defense to the felony-murder charge.
- Following this adverse ruling, Paul Sims pled guilty to first-degree murder.
- The trial court accepted the plea and imposed a sentence.
- Sims (appellant) then filed a direct appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, arguing that his guilty plea was coerced by the trial court's pretrial ruling.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Under the West Virginia felony-murder statute, does a defendant's claim that a killing was accidental or unintentional constitute a valid defense that can mitigate a first-degree murder charge?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Miller
No, a defendant's claim that a killing was accidental or unintentional does not constitute a valid defense under the felony-murder rule. The court reasoned that the felony-murder rule, as inherited from common law and codified in West Virginia statute, does not require the state to prove malice, premeditation, or a specific intent to kill. The intent to commit the underlying felony is sufficient to supply the requisite mental state for first-degree murder. The court rejected the argument that the word 'murder' in the statute requires the state to first prove a common law murder, clarifying that in this context, it simply means 'homicide.' As this legal principle is well-settled, the trial court's ruling was correct, and defense counsel's advice to plead guilty in light of that ruling was competent, rendering the plea voluntary.
Analysis:
This case solidifies the strict liability nature of West Virginia's felony-murder rule, affirming that the mens rea for murder is transferred from the intent to commit the underlying dangerous felony. The decision explicitly closes the door on defenses based on accident or lack of intent to kill once the commission of an enumerated felony is established. This aligns West Virginia with the traditional, majority interpretation of the felony-murder doctrine and reinforces that participants in such felonies are held responsible for any deaths that result, regardless of intent.
Unlock the full brief for State v. Sims