State v. Patrick Cahill
196 A.3d 744 (2018)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An act that causes temporary impairment of a bodily function, such as breathing, constitutes a 'physical injury' sufficient to support a conviction for second-degree child abuse when the act is determined to be excessive corporal punishment.
Facts:
- On August 20, 2012, Abigail (age 9) and her sister Beth were at their father's house, where their adult half-brother, Patrick Cahill, was also present.
- After Cahill refused Abigail's request to go outside, she ran out of the house, and he chased after her.
- Cahill caught Abigail at his girlfriend's car, grabbed her by her high ponytail, and pulled her back into the house, a distance of approximately 30 feet.
- Inside, Cahill threw Abigail onto a couch and placed his knee on her chest and stomach area, causing a sharp pain.
- Cahill then squeezed Abigail's cheeks with one hand while placing his other hand on her throat, applying pressure that caused her face to turn red.
- During the incident on the couch, which lasted about a minute with pressure applied to the neck for about five seconds, Abigail had difficulty breathing.
- The following day, Abigail's mother took her to Hasbro Children's Hospital after she complained of cheek pain.
Procedural Posture:
- Patrick Cahill was charged with one count of second-degree child abuse in Providence County Superior Court.
- Cahill waived his right to a jury, and a bench trial was held before a trial justice.
- The trial justice found Cahill guilty of second-degree child abuse.
- Cahill filed a motion for a new trial, which the court treated as a motion to vacate the judgment.
- The trial justice denied Cahill's post-trial motion and sentenced him to ten years' imprisonment, with six months to serve.
- Cahill (appellant) appealed the judgment of conviction to the Supreme Court of Rhode Island, arguing against the State of Rhode Island (appellee).
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a defendant's act of pulling a child by the hair, kneeling on her chest, and briefly placing a hand on her throat, causing pain and temporary difficulty breathing, constitute 'physical injury' sufficient to support a conviction for second-degree child abuse under G.L. 1956 § 11-9-5.3(b)(2)?
Opinions:
Majority - Chief Justice Suttell
Yes. A defendant's actions that cause pain and temporarily impair a bodily function like breathing satisfy the 'physical injury' element for second-degree child abuse when deemed to be excessive corporal punishment. The court found that the trial justice did not err in his conviction. Any potential error in admitting Dr. Kaplan's testimony was harmless in a jury-waived trial, as an experienced judge is capable of properly weighing such evidence and did not need an expert to understand a term like 'strangulation' in light of the facts. The court also held that because the trial justice found that the state had proven all elements of the greater offense of second-degree child abuse beyond a reasonable doubt, he was not required to consider the lesser-included offense of simple assault. The court ultimately deferred to the trial justice's factual findings and credibility determinations, concluding that he did not overlook material evidence in finding that Cahill's actions constituted excessive corporal punishment resulting in physical injury.
Analysis:
This case clarifies the threshold for 'physical injury' under Rhode Island's second-degree child abuse statute, establishing that the injury need not be serious or permanent. The court's holding that the temporary impairment of a bodily function (like breathing) suffices sets a significant precedent for cases involving strangulation or choking. Furthermore, the opinion strongly reaffirms the high degree of deference appellate courts grant to the factual findings and credibility assessments of a trial justice in a bench trial, especially in determining subjective standards like 'excessive' corporal punishment. This makes it more difficult for defendants to challenge convictions from jury-waived trials on the basis of the weight of the evidence.
