State v. Myers

Supreme Court of Louisiana
2000 WL 366290, 760 So.2d 310 (2000)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

Under Louisiana's felony manslaughter statute, criminal liability attaches only when the killing is committed by the defendant or an accomplice acting in furtherance of the underlying felony, not when the killing is performed by a third party, such as a police officer, resisting the felony.


Facts:

  • Police received a tip that a Cuban male was selling crack cocaine at 1118 St. Andrew Street and set up surveillance.
  • Detectives observed Robert M. Myers enter the residence with a key and conduct three apparent hand-to-hand drug transactions.
  • Myers and Jessie Lopez lived together in the apartment where the drug activity was occurring.
  • Police obtained a search warrant and proceeded to the residence, where they saw Lopez on the front steps.
  • Upon seeing the officers, Lopez ran inside the house and locked the door.
  • After police forced entry, Myers was apprehended and cooperated, while Lopez barricaded himself in a back bedroom.
  • When Detective Joseph Thomas opened the bedroom door, Lopez shot and killed him.
  • In response, Detective Paul Toye shot and killed Lopez.

Procedural Posture:

  • Robert M. Myers was indicted by a grand jury for the manslaughter of Officer Joseph Thomas and Jessie Lopez.
  • Following a jury trial, Myers was found guilty on both counts.
  • The trial court sentenced Myers to twenty years at hard labor on each count, to run concurrently.
  • Myers (as appellant) appealed to the intermediate court of appeal, which reversed both of his convictions and sentences.
  • The State of Louisiana (as appellant) petitioned the Supreme Court of Louisiana for a writ of certiorari, which the court granted.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Is there sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of felony manslaughter for the deaths of a police officer and a co-felon when the co-felon killed the officer and another officer killed the co-felon during the commission of the underlying felony?


Opinions:

Majority - Marcus, Justice

Yes, for the death of Officer Thomas; No, for the death of Lopez. Under Louisiana's "agency theory" of felony manslaughter, a defendant is criminally liable for lethal acts committed by a co-felon in furtherance of their joint felony but is not liable for lethal acts committed by a third party resisting that felony. The court reasoned that the term "offender" in the felony manslaughter statute (La. R.S. 14:31) refers only to the defendant or an accomplice. Because Lopez was Myers' accomplice in the underlying drug felony, Myers is criminally liable for Lopez's act of killing Officer Thomas in furtherance of that crime. Conversely, because Detective Toye was not an accomplice but a third party resisting the felony, Myers is not criminally liable for Detective Toye's killing of Lopez.



Analysis:

This decision reaffirms Louisiana's adherence to the majority "agency theory" of felony manslaughter, rejecting the minority "proximate cause" theory. It clarifies that criminal culpability for a death during a felony does not extend to killings committed by non-participants, such as police officers or victims. This holding solidifies the legal principle that a felon is responsible for the acts of their co-felons but not for the responsive, lethal acts of those attempting to thwart the crime, providing clear guidance for future charging decisions in similar cases.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query State v. Myers (2000) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.