State v. McFadden
320 N.W.2d 608 (1982)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A participant in an illegal drag race can be convicted of involuntary manslaughter for any deaths that are the proximate cause of the race, including the death of a co-participant. A separate offense arises for each death caused by a single act of vehicular manslaughter, allowing for multiple convictions and sentences.
Facts:
- Michael Dwayne McFadden and Matthew Sulgrove engaged in a drag race on a Des Moines city street.
- During the race, both drivers reached speeds estimated at 70-75 m.p.h. and engaged in competitive 'cat-and-mouse' driving maneuvers.
- Sulgrove, while attempting to pass other vehicles at a high rate of speed, lost control of his automobile.
- Sulgrove's vehicle swerved into a lane of oncoming traffic and collided with a northbound vehicle.
- The collision killed Sulgrove and a six-year-old passenger in the northbound vehicle, Faith Ellis.
- McFadden's automobile did not physically contact either of the two vehicles involved in the collision.
Procedural Posture:
- Michael Dwayne McFadden was charged in an Iowa trial court with two counts of involuntary manslaughter.
- McFadden waived his right to a jury trial.
- Following a bench trial, the trial court found McFadden guilty on both counts and imposed concurrent sentences.
- McFadden, as the appellant, appealed his convictions and sentences to the Supreme Court of Iowa.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a participant in a drag race's reckless conduct a proximate cause of the deaths of a co-participant and an innocent third party, sufficient for an involuntary manslaughter conviction, even if the participant's vehicle never makes physical contact with the colliding vehicles?
Opinions:
Majority - Allbee, Justice.
Yes. A drag race participant's reckless conduct is a proximate cause of deaths resulting from the race, which is sufficient for an involuntary manslaughter conviction even without physical contact. The court rejects the need for a more stringent causation standard in criminal cases, holding that the tort liability concept of proximate cause is appropriate. The court reasoned that since involuntary manslaughter requires the underlying public offense (drag racing) to be committed recklessly, the additional foreseeability requirement of proximate cause prevents unjust results. A death is a foreseeable consequence of drag racing on a public street. The court also held that a co-participant's voluntary participation in the race does not absolve the defendant of criminal liability for that co-participant's death, as the defendant's actions were a contributing and substantial factor. Finally, the court ruled that a defendant's alleged withdrawal from the race is not an absolute defense but merely a factor to be considered in the proximate cause analysis.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies that Iowa applies the ordinary tort concept of proximate cause to involuntary manslaughter cases, explicitly rejecting a stricter 'direct causal connection' standard used in some other jurisdictions. The ruling establishes that participation in a mutually dangerous activity like a drag race is sufficient to create criminal liability for all foreseeable consequences, including the death of a fellow participant who voluntarily assumed the risk. Furthermore, the case overrules prior state precedent by holding that a single reckless act resulting in multiple deaths gives rise to a separate offense for each victim, allowing for multiple convictions and sentences.
Unlock the full brief for State v. McFadden