State v. M.L.C.
311 Utah Adv. Rep. 26, 933 P.2d 380, 1997 Utah LEXIS 19 (1997)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A juvenile charged by criminal information under a serious youth offender statute is not considered a 'person charged with a crime' for constitutional bail purposes until the juvenile court formally determines the juvenile should be bound over to be tried as an adult. Therefore, denying bail to such a juvenile pending that bindover determination does not violate state or federal constitutional provisions.
Facts:
- In October 1995, M.L.C. was sixteen years old.
- M.L.C. was accused of committing aggravated robbery while using a firearm.
- A criminal information was filed against M.L.C. in juvenile court under Utah's Serious Youth Offender Act.
- The Act required the juvenile court to hold a determination hearing to decide whether M.L.C. would be tried as an adult in district court or remain within the juvenile court system.
- M.L.C. was detained without bail pending this determination hearing.
Procedural Posture:
- M.L.C. was charged by criminal information with aggravated robbery in the Third District Juvenile Court.
- Before the determination hearing, M.L.C. filed a motion in the juvenile court to set bail.
- The juvenile court denied M.L.C.'s motion for bail, citing state statutes.
- Following a determination hearing, the juvenile court ordered M.L.C. bound over to be tried as an adult in district court and then set bail at $20,000.
- M.L.C. appealed the juvenile court's initial order denying him bail pending the bindover determination directly to the Utah Supreme Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does denying bail to a juvenile charged under Utah's Serious Youth Offender Act, pending a juvenile court's determination of whether to bind the juvenile over for trial as an adult, violate the juvenile's rights under the Utah Constitution's bail and unnecessary rigor provisions or the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment and Equal Protection Clause?
Opinions:
Majority - Russon, Justice
No, denying bail to a juvenile pending a bindover determination does not violate state or federal constitutional rights. The court reasoned that juvenile proceedings are fundamentally civil in nature, and constitutional rights applicable in adult criminal proceedings, such as the right to bail, do not automatically apply. Under the Serious Youth Offender Act, a juvenile is not yet a 'person charged with a crime' within the meaning of the Utah Constitution's bail provision until the juvenile court makes the threshold determination to bind them over to adult court. Prior to that determination, the criminal information is treated as a juvenile petition, and the matter remains within the juvenile system where bail is not a guaranteed right. The court also held that the 'unnecessary rigor' clause applies to the conditions of confinement, not the right to bail. Finally, there is no equal protection violation because juveniles and adults are not similarly situated classes regarding bail, and the different treatment is reasonably related to the distinct rehabilitative and protective purposes of the Juvenile Courts Act.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the legal boundary between the juvenile and adult justice systems, even when a juvenile is accused of a serious, adult-like crime. It affirms that the special status and protections of the juvenile system persist until a formal judicial transfer to the adult system occurs. The ruling establishes that the constitutional rights of an adult criminal defendant, specifically the right to bail, do not attach at the moment of charging under a hybrid statute, but only upon the formal decision to prosecute as an adult. This precedent grants states latitude in structuring their serious youth offender laws, allowing them to detain juveniles without bail during the critical evaluation period to determine the appropriate forum, balancing public safety with the goals of juvenile justice.
