State of Louisiana v. Ray Jones

Supreme Court of Louisiana
398 So. 2d 1049 (1981)

ELI5:

Rule of Law:

If a defendant’s guilty plea is induced by a prosecutor's promise, due process requires that the promise be fulfilled; if it is not, the defendant is entitled to either enforcement of the agreement or withdrawal of the plea. Additionally, a sentence, even if within statutory limits, may be unconstitutionally excessive if it is not individualized to the offender and the offense.

Facts:

On November 1, 1978, Ray Jones sold a 'lid' of marijuana to an undercover agent for $12.00.
On December 1, 1978, Jones again sold a 'lid' of marijuana to the same undercover agent for $12.00.
Jones's defense counsel alleged that he negotiated an agreement with Assistant District Attorney Toups for Jones to plead guilty to a reduced charge in exchange for a sentence of probation and a large fine.
The state's sole eyewitness to the sales, the undercover agent, was out of the country and unavailable to testify at a potential trial.
Jones had no prior criminal convictions.
At the time of sentencing, Jones was regularly employed in the construction industry, supporting his common-law wife and children, and contributing to the support of his mother and sisters.

Procedural Posture:

The State of Louisiana charged Ray Jones with distribution of marijuana.
Pursuant to a plea bargain, the state reduced the charge to attempted distribution of marijuana, and Jones pleaded guilty in the trial court.
The trial court sentenced Jones to five years imprisonment at hard labor and a $7,000 fine.
Jones, as appellant, appealed to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, arguing his plea was involuntary and the sentence was excessive.
The Supreme Court of Louisiana found the trial court's justification for the sentence inadequate, vacated the sentence, and remanded for resentencing.
On remand, the trial court held a new hearing but imposed the identical sentence.
Jones, as appellant, again appealed the sentence to the Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Is a near-maximum sentence enforceable and a guilty plea valid when the defendant alleges the plea was induced by an unfulfilled prosecutorial promise of probation, and the sentence is not supported by the defendant's background or the nature of the offense?

Opinions:

Majority - Dixon, Chief Justice

No. A guilty plea induced by an unfulfilled prosecutorial promise is invalid, and a sentence must be tailored to the specific offender and offense. The court held that if a guilty plea rests on a promise from the prosecutor, that promise must be fulfilled as a matter of due process, citing Santobello v. New York. Here, defense counsel's unrefuted testimony suggested that Jones's plea was induced by a promise of probation. The record was deficient, but if such a promise was made, it must be enforced. Alternatively, if Jones justifiably believed such a promise was made, his plea was not knowingly entered and he must be allowed to plead anew. The court further reasoned that, even absent the plea bargain issue, the sentence imposed was excessive. Maximum sentences are reserved for the most serious violations and the worst offenders. Given that Jones had no prior record, the amount of marijuana was small, and the state's case was weakened by the absence of its key witness, the near-maximum sentence of five years at hard labor was not justified.

Analysis:

This decision reinforces the contractual nature of plea bargains in Louisiana, affirming that prosecutors are bound by the promises they make to induce a guilty plea. It establishes a clear remedy for a breached plea agreement: either specific performance of the deal or withdrawal of the plea. The case also solidifies the appellate court's authority to review sentences for excessiveness, even when they are within statutory maximums. It requires trial judges not only to follow the sentencing guidelines of C.Cr.P. 894.1 but also to ensure the factual record supports the severity of the sentence imposed, particularly when applying a maximum or near-maximum penalty.

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: State of Louisiana v. Ray Jones (1981)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"