State v. Johnson
525 S.E.2d 830, 136 N.C. App. 683, 2000 N.C. App. LEXIS 164 (2000)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
After a juvenile in custody invokes their right to remain silent, a non-verbal gesture, such as an affirmative nod, can constitute a re-initiation of communication with law enforcement, thereby permitting officers to resume questioning and obtain a valid waiver of rights.
Facts:
- On August 23, 1996, a taxi was dispatched for Danny Ray Pack in Shelby, North Carolina.
- Shortly after arriving, Pack radioed his dispatcher stating he had been shot; he was later found with two gunshot wounds to the head and subsequently died.
- An empty holster was found on Pack's side, and it was later determined his nine-millimeter pistol was missing.
- Police investigation led to two other individuals, Eric Wright and Keith Hamilton, who implicated 15-year-old Tydis Johnson in the robbery and murder.
- On August 26, 1996, police located and arrested Johnson for the homicide.
- At the police station, in the presence of his mother, Johnson was advised of his Miranda rights.
- When a detective asked Johnson, "Having these rights in mind, do you wish to answer questions?", Johnson verbally responded, "No."
- Immediately following his response, Johnson's mother interjected, stating, "No, we need to get this straightened out today. We’ll talk with him anyway."
- After his mother spoke, Johnson looked at her, lowered his head, then turned to the detective and nodded his head affirmatively, after which he agreed to answer questions and gave an inculpatory statement.
Procedural Posture:
- Tydis Johnson (defendant) was charged with first degree murder and robbery with a dangerous weapon.
- Prior to trial, the defendant filed a motion to suppress his statement to the police.
- The trial court conducted a hearing and denied the defendant's motion to suppress.
- Following a trial, a jury found the defendant guilty of first degree murder and robbery with a dangerous weapon.
- The trial court sentenced the defendant to life imprisonment without parole.
- The defendant (appellant) appealed his conviction to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a juvenile's affirmative nod to a detective, made immediately after invoking the right to silence and in response to a parent's urging to cooperate, constitute a valid re-initiation of communication that allows police to resume questioning?
Opinions:
Majority - Hunter, Judge
Yes, a juvenile's affirmative nod to a detective constitutes a re-initiation of communication. When a suspect in custody invokes the right to silence, police may not continue interrogation unless the suspect initiates further communication. In this case, although Johnson initially stated he did not wish to answer questions, he subsequently re-initiated the conversation by turning to the detective and nodding affirmatively. This non-verbal gesture communicated a willingness to talk and was a direct response that allowed the detective to ask clarifying questions about waiving his rights. Because Johnson, not the officer, initiated the communication that led to the waiver and confession, his subsequent statement was admissible.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the 'initiation' standard for juveniles who have invoked their right to silence under North Carolina law. It establishes that a non-verbal gesture, even one prompted by parental influence, can be legally sufficient to constitute a re-initiation of communication, thereby allowing police to resume questioning. The ruling underscores the fact-specific nature of waiver analysis and highlights the significant legal consequences of a parent's actions during a juvenile's interrogation. Future cases involving juvenile waivers will likely examine the specific context of any communication, verbal or non-verbal, that follows an invocation of the right to silence.
