State v. Goff
1984 Ore. LEXIS 1635, 686 P.2d 1023, 297 Or. 635 (1984)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A person can be convicted of child neglect under a criminal negligence standard based on the totality of the circumstances, which includes the duration a child was left unattended, the potential dangers in the environment, and the parent's conduct and state of mind during the entire period of absence.
Facts:
- On October 31, 1981, defendant Goff was living with her two children, aged eight years and 22 months.
- Around 9:30 p.m., Goff and two other adults left the children alone in the house to attend a Halloween party at a tavern several blocks away.
- The home contained accessible matches and candles, and the adults living there were cigarette smokers.
- Goff remained at the tavern until 2 a.m., during which time she consumed eight or nine beers.
- Between the time Goff left and returned, a fire started in the back bedroom of the house.
- Upon returning home after the tavern closed, Goff found the house filled with smoke and discovered both of her children had died from asphyxiation.
Procedural Posture:
- Goff was convicted of child neglect by a jury in an Oregon district court (trial court).
- Goff, as the appellant, appealed the conviction to the Oregon Court of Appeals.
- The Court of Appeals, an intermediate appellate court, reversed the conviction, finding insufficient evidence to support the verdict.
- The State of Oregon, as the petitioner, was granted review by the Supreme Court of Oregon, the state's highest court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the evidence that a parent left two young children, ages eight and 22 months, unattended for approximately five hours on Halloween night in a home with accessible matches while she consumed alcohol at a nearby tavern constitute sufficient proof to support a jury's finding of criminal negligence under Oregon's child neglect statute?
Opinions:
Majority - Jones, J.
Yes. To convict a person of child neglect, there must be sufficient evidence of both the physical element (leaving a child in an endangering situation) and the mental element (criminal negligence), both of which are assessed based on the totality of the circumstances. The court reasoned that criminal negligence is not confined to the moment the child is left, but extends throughout the entire period the child is unattended. In this case, a jury could reasonably find the risk was substantial and unjustifiable given the children's ages, the five-hour duration of absence, the presence of accessible matches on Halloween night, and Goff's consumption of alcohol. The court also held that evidence of Goff's drinking was relevant to her awareness of the risk, and the tragic outcome was relevant to proving the substantiality of that risk.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies that the standard of criminal negligence for child neglect in Oregon is not limited to a single, pre-existing dangerous condition but must be evaluated based on the totality of the circumstances created by the defendant's actions. It establishes that a parent's conduct while away from the child, such as drinking, is directly relevant to their culpable mental state. Furthermore, the case confirms that the ultimate outcome, however tragic, is admissible evidence to demonstrate the substantial nature of the risk the defendant failed to perceive, broadening the scope of evidence in such prosecutions.
