State ex rel. L.M.
2011 WL 230328, 2011 La. App. LEXIS 69, 57 So. 3d 518 (2011)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Child neglect sufficient for a 'child in need of care' adjudication is not limited to a lack of physical shelter, but includes a parent's persistent and unreasonable failure to provide a sanitary living environment, adequate food, supervision, and hygiene, where such failure substantially threatens the child's physical or emotional health and safety.
Facts:
- M.M. ('the mother') is the unemployed mother of five boys, whose income consisted of child support, social security disability for one child, and food stamps.
- In July 2009, the Department of Children and Family Services (OCS) received a report that the children lacked adequate food and shelter and that the mother sold food stamps to play bingo.
- An OCS investigation validated the report, finding the home extremely unsanitary with piles of trash, dirty diapers, a foul odor that caused a worker to feel ill, and very little food.
- Over an eight-month period, OCS and other agencies provided intensive services, but the family's living conditions did not improve across three different residences, with the filth and foul odor persisting.
- The children were often unkempt and improperly clothed; one child frequently had bathroom accidents at school and was sent back the next day in the same soiled clothing.
- Two of the school-aged children, W.M. (age 11) and O.M. (age 5), accumulated numerous unexcused absences and tardies.
- The mother admitted to playing bingo 3-4 times a week, leaving her children with their 17-year-old brother, who in turn would leave the 11-year-old in charge of the younger children.
- Witnesses observed the mother hitting her children for urinating on themselves, and described the children as always being dirty, smelling of urine, and hungry.
Procedural Posture:
- The Franklin Parish District Attorney’s Office, on behalf of the state, filed a petition in juvenile court alleging the mother's minimal cooperation with a case plan and failure to provide adequate care.
- Following an initial hearing, the juvenile court ordered the mother to cooperate with the Office of Community Services (OCS) and its offered services.
- Due to the mother's continued non-compliance and worsening home conditions, the District Attorney filed an instanter order to remove the children from the mother's custody, which the court granted for four of the five children.
- The District Attorney then filed a formal petition seeking to have the four children adjudicated as 'children in need of care' based on consistent acts of neglect and abuse.
- After a full adjudication hearing where multiple witnesses testified, the juvenile court adjudicated the four children as in need of care.
- Following a subsequent disposition hearing, the court granted custody of the two youngest children to their natural father and continued the other two boys in OCS custody, to be cared for by relatives.
- The mother, M.M., appealed the juvenile court's adjudication and disposition judgments to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a parent's persistent failure to provide a sanitary home, adequate supervision, and proper care, despite having sufficient financial resources and receiving state assistance, constitute neglect sufficient to adjudicate her children as 'in need of care' under the Louisiana Children's Code?
Opinions:
Majority - Williams, J.
Yes, a parent's persistent failure to provide a sanitary home, adequate supervision, and proper care constitutes neglect sufficient to adjudicate her children as 'in need of care.' The record supports the juvenile court's finding that the mother's actions and inactions substantially threatened the children's physical, mental, and emotional health and safety. The court reasoned that 'neglect' is defined broadly to allow juvenile courts to apply their experience to the unique facts of each case. The primary issue was not the lack of a house, but the 'alarming living conditions within the home,' including extreme filth, a foul odor, insufficient food, lack of supervision, and poor hygiene. The mother's own admission that 'cleaning is hard,' her failure to comply with the OCS case plan despite extensive services, and her consistent disregard for the children's well-being demonstrated a refusal or failure to supply necessary care, justifying the adjudication.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies that the legal standard for 'neglect' under the Louisiana Children's Code extends beyond the mere provision of a physical structure for shelter. It establishes that a qualitative assessment of the living environment, focusing on sanitation, safety, and parental supervision, is central to a neglect determination. The ruling reinforces the broad discretion of juvenile courts to intervene when a parent's pattern of behavior creates a substantial risk of harm, particularly when the parent fails to utilize available state-offered resources to remedy the situation. Future cases will likely cite this decision to support 'in need of care' adjudications based on chronically unsanitary living conditions and a demonstrated lack of parental engagement, even in the absence of direct physical abuse.
