State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.
94 N.J. 473, 13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20837, 468 A.2d 150 (1983)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A landowner is strictly liable for harm caused by toxic wastes that are stored on or escape from their property, as the disposal of such wastes is considered an abnormally dangerous activity. Furthermore, a state environmental statute may impose retroactive, joint and several strict liability on any party 'in any way responsible' for the discharge of hazardous substances, including parent corporations that exercise significant control over a polluting subsidiary.
Facts:
- From 1929 to 1960, a company named F.W. Berk and Company, Inc. (Berk) operated a mercury processing plant on a forty-acre tract, dumping untreated waste material and allowing mercury-laden effluent to drain onto the land and into the adjacent Berry's Creek.
- In 1960, Velsicol Chemical Corporation (Velsicol) created Wood Ridge Chemical Corporation (Wood Ridge) as a wholly-owned subsidiary for the sole purpose of purchasing Berk's assets and continuing the mercury processing operations.
- Throughout its ownership, Velsicol maintained extensive control over Wood Ridge, with all of Wood Ridge's directors being Velsicol officers, and Velsicol personnel being constantly involved in Wood Ridge's day-to-day operations.
- In 1967, Wood Ridge subdivided the tract, transferring thirty-three acres to Velsicol, which then permitted Wood Ridge to continue dumping mercury waste onto that Velsicol-owned land.
- In 1968, Velsicol sold all its Wood Ridge stock to Ventron Corporation (Ventron).
- Wood Ridge continued its operations until 1974, when it was merged into Ventron, with Ventron expressly assuming all of Wood Ridge's liabilities and obligations.
- In 1974, Ventron sold a 7.1-acre portion of the contaminated site to Robert M. and Rita W. Wolf, intentionally failing to disclose the severe mercury pollution.
- Decades of dumping by Berk and Wood Ridge resulted in an estimated 268 tons of toxic waste saturating the land and severely contaminating Berry’s Creek.
Procedural Posture:
- The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) sued Ventron, Wood Ridge, Velsicol, Berk, and the Wolfs in state trial court for cleanup costs.
- The defendants cross-claimed against each other, and the Wolfs filed a cross-claim against Ventron for fraudulent nondisclosure.
- After a bench trial, the trial court found Berk and Wood Ridge jointly liable, and Velsicol and Ventron severally liable for half the costs, while holding the Wolfs were not liable. The court also found for the Wolfs on their cross-claim against Ventron.
- Multiple parties appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court, the state's intermediate appellate court.
- The Appellate Division modified the judgment, imposing retroactive, joint and several liability on Velsicol and Ventron for all cleanup costs under the newly amended Spill Act.
- Velsicol and Ventron's petition for certification was granted by the Supreme Court of New Jersey, the state's highest court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Are a parent corporation and a successor corporation strictly liable for the cleanup costs of toxic waste pollution caused by the subsidiary and its predecessor under both common law principles of abnormally dangerous activities and the New Jersey Spill Act?
Opinions:
Majority - Pollock, J.
Yes. A parent corporation and a successor corporation are strictly liable for the cleanup costs of toxic waste pollution under both common law and statutory law. The court held that the disposal of toxic mercury waste is an abnormally dangerous activity, which imposes strict liability on those who engage in it or permit it on their land. Under this common law principle, Berk and Wood Ridge were liable for their polluting activities, Ventron was liable as Wood Ridge's corporate successor which assumed its liabilities, and Velsicol was liable as a landowner that permitted the dumping. Separately, the court found the companies liable under the New Jersey Spill Act, which retroactively imposes joint and several strict liability on any person 'in any way responsible' for a hazardous substance discharge. The court declined to pierce the corporate veil under traditional common law but found Velsicol was 'in any way responsible' under the Act due to its total control over Wood Ridge's operations and its direct ownership of the land used for dumping.
Analysis:
This decision is a landmark in environmental and corporate law, firmly establishing that the disposal of toxic waste is an 'abnormally dangerous activity' subject to strict liability in New Jersey. By adopting the principles of Rylands v. Fletcher and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, the court ensured polluters are held financially responsible regardless of fault. Critically, the court's broad interpretation of the Spill Act's 'in any way responsible' language creates a powerful tool for holding parent corporations liable for the environmental torts of their subsidiaries based on operational control, without needing to meet the high bar for traditional corporate veil-piercing. This precedent significantly expands the scope of liability for environmental contamination, making it harder for corporations to use subsidiaries to shield themselves from cleanup costs.
