Spell v. McDaniel
824 F.2d 1380 (1987)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A municipality can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a constitutional violation caused by its employee if the violation resulted from a deficient training policy or a condoned custom of unconstitutional practices, provided the deficiencies or condonation stemmed from the deliberate indifference or reckless disregard of municipal policymakers, and there is a sufficiently close causal link making the violation a reasonable probability.
Facts:
- Henry Spell was stopped by Officer Charles McDaniel while driving in Fayetteville, North Carolina, admittedly inebriated on alcohol and quaaludes.
- Officer McDaniel found quaaludes in Spell's car, arrested Spell and his passenger, handcuffed them both, and took them to the police station.
- At the police station, after Spell completed a breathalyzer test and was returned, still handcuffed and inebriated, to McDaniel's custody, McDaniel, without any physical provocation, brutally assaulted Spell.
- McDaniel violently kneed Spell in the groin, rupturing one of his testicles, which necessitated its surgical removal and resulted in irreversible sterility and considerable pain and suffering.
- The City's Police Chief, Dixon, and Command Sergeant Holman, set up and ran the Fayetteville Police Academy where Officer McDaniel was trained.
- Officer McDaniel testified that he had been taught in the Fayetteville Police Academy that striking or grabbing an arrestee's testicles was an accepted method of subduing them.
- Evidence from lay citizens, present and former police officers, and internal police records revealed a widespread pattern of excessive force by City police officers, an effective 'code of silence' within the department, and a lack of disciplinary action for such violence, known to responsible municipal officials.
- Police Chief Dixon's official job description specified his authority to plan, program, direct, and evaluate the police department, formulate and implement police policy, and promote, assign, and discipline all personnel, an authority he actively exercised.
Procedural Posture:
- Henry Spell initiated a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Officer Charles McDaniel in his individual and official capacities, and against the City of Fayetteville and several city officials (City Manager, Police Chief, Internal Affairs Director, command sergeants) in their official capacities, in federal district court.
- Spell alleged that McDaniel used excessive force and that the City was liable under Monell for the conduct being pursuant to a municipal 'policy or custom.'
- The case proceeded to an 18-day jury trial on the issues of McDaniel's individual liability and the City's municipal liability.
- The first jury found McDaniel and the City jointly and severally liable but awarded only $1,000 in compensatory damages.
- The district court granted Spell's motion for a new trial solely on the compensatory damages issue, deeming the initial award inadequate, and denied the defendants’ counter-motion for a new trial on all issues.
- A second jury trial on the damages issue resulted in a verdict for $900,000 compensatory damages.
- The district court denied the defendants’ renewed post-verdict motions for judgment n.o.v. or a new trial.
- The district court awarded Spell attorney fees and costs totaling $335,942.57.
- Joint and several judgments were then entered against McDaniel and the City for the damage and fee awards.
- McDaniel and the City appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, challenging various trial rulings and the attorney fees award, with McDaniel and the City as appellants.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a municipality incur liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a police officer's use of excessive force if the injury resulted from the city's deficient training policy or a condoned custom of unconstitutional practices, attributable to municipal policymakers acting with deliberate indifference?
Opinions:
Majority - James Dickson Phillips
Yes, a municipality incurs liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for an employee's constitutional violation, such as excessive force by a police officer, if it resulted from a deficient training policy or a condoned custom of unconstitutional practices, provided these were attributable to municipal policymakers acting with deliberate indifference and causally linked to the injury. The court reiterated that municipal liability under § 1983 cannot be based on respondeat superior (vicarious liability) but requires that the injury be inflicted pursuant to a municipal "policy or custom" as established in Monell v. Department of Social Services. Municipal "policy" can be found in explicit ordinances or regulations, or in ad hoc policy choices by officials with policymaking authority. "Custom" can be established by persistent and widespread practices that are so permanent and well-settled as to have the force of law, known actually or constructively by the municipal governing body or policymakers. The court outlined two theories for municipal liability related to police misconduct: (1) deficient programs of police training and supervision, and (2) irresponsible failure by municipal policymakers to correct a widespread pattern of unconstitutional conduct. For deficient training, the policy must be attributable to municipal officials with final authority, and the deficiencies must stem from deliberate indifference or reckless disregard for constitutional rights, making the specific violation a "reasonable probability" or "almost bound to happen." For condoned custom, there must be actual or constructive knowledge by responsible policymakers of widespread unconstitutional practices and their failure (with specific intent or deliberate indifference) to correct them, making the specific violation "reasonably probable." The court found sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict under both theories, concluding that Police Chief Dixon was an authorized policymaker who established and implemented a deficient training program that encouraged excessive force, or condoned widespread abuses through deliberate cover-up and disregard. The court affirmed the lower court's decision on the merits, including the damages award, and most of the attorney fees, but vacated the portion of attorney fees that included a "contingency multiplier" based on the Supreme Court's recent Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air decision. This decision held that such multipliers are only permissible if shown to be necessary to attract competent counsel in the relevant market, and not merely for case-specific risks or unpopularity of a case.
Analysis:
This case significantly clarified the standards for establishing municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for police misconduct, particularly under theories of deficient training and condoned custom, building upon Monell and Tuttle. It emphasized the requirement of 'deliberate indifference' as the fault standard for policymakers and a strong causal link ('almost bound to happen') between the policy/custom and the constitutional violation. The ruling also provided important guidance on the application of attorney fee multipliers under § 1988, curtailing their use to situations where a showing of market necessity, not merely case-specific risk, is made, impacting how attorneys are compensated in civil rights litigation.
