Spaulding v. Morse
322 Mass. 149, 76 N.E.2d 137, 1947 Mass. LEXIS 747 (1947)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When interpreting a written agreement, a court will look to the circumstances at the time of execution and the overall instrument to determine the parties' main purpose. If this purpose is temporarily impossible to achieve due to unforeseen events, a party's performance obligations related to that purpose may be suspended by implication.
Facts:
- George D. Morse and Ruth D. Morse divorced in 1932.
- On July 30, 1937, they created a trust agreement for the support of their minor son, Richard.
- The agreement required George to pay a trustee $1,200 annually for Richard's 'maintenance and education' until he entered college.
- Upon Richard entering college, the payments would increase to $2,200 annually for up to four years.
- George made all required payments until February 1, 1946.
- Richard graduated from high school on February 5, 1946.
- The following day, February 6, 1946, Richard was inducted into the United States Army and did not enroll in college.
Procedural Posture:
- The succeeding trustee filed a bill in equity in a state trial court to enforce the trust agreement against George D. Morse.
- The trial judge, based on a statement of agreed facts, entered a final decree in favor of the trustee.
- The decree ordered Morse to pay $1,500 in arrears and to make future monthly payments contingent on his son's potential college enrollment.
- George D. Morse, the defendant at trial, appealed the decree to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, becoming the appellant.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a father's contractual obligation under a trust agreement to make payments for his son's 'maintenance and education' continue when the son's maintenance is fully provided for by the U.S. Army and his education is postponed due to military service?
Opinions:
Majority - Dolan, J.
No. The father's obligation to make payments is suspended while his son is in the military. A written instrument must be interpreted to give effect to the main purpose the parties sought to accomplish. Here, the agreement's express purpose was to provide for Richard's maintenance and education. When Richard joined the armed forces, the U.S. government provided for his maintenance, and his higher education was postponed. Since the two core purposes of the agreement were not being fulfilled, the court implied a condition suspending the father's payment obligation, concluding it would be contrary to the parties' original intent to require payments when their intended purpose could not be met.
Analysis:
This decision exemplifies the principle of contractual interpretation where a court will look beyond the literal words to discern the underlying purpose of an agreement. It establishes that performance of a contractual duty can be temporarily excused when unforeseen circumstances frustrate the contract's primary purpose, even if the agreement does not contain an express clause for such a contingency. The ruling also reinforces the judicial principle of refusing to grant specific performance for future, contingent obligations, thereby limiting court orders to ripe, existing controversies rather than speculative future events.
