Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon
596 U.S. ____ (2022)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A worker who frequently loads and unloads cargo onto vehicles of interstate transportation is a member of a 'class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce' and is therefore exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act under §1.
Facts:
- Latrice Saxon worked for Southwest Airlines as a ramp supervisor at Chicago Midway International Airport.
- Saxon's duties included training and supervising teams of ramp agents who physically loaded and unloaded cargo onto airplanes.
- In addition to supervising, Saxon frequently loaded and unloaded baggage, airmail, and commercial cargo herself alongside the ramp agents.
- The airplanes Saxon loaded and unloaded traveled across the country to domestic and international destinations.
- Saxon's employment contract with Southwest contained a clause requiring her to resolve wage disputes through individual arbitration.
- Saxon came to believe that Southwest was failing to pay her and other ramp supervisors proper overtime wages.
Procedural Posture:
- Latrice Saxon filed a putative class action against Southwest Airlines in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
- Southwest Airlines moved to dismiss the suit and compel individual arbitration, citing a clause in Saxon's employment contract.
- Saxon argued that she was exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) under §1 as a transportation worker.
- The District Court (court of first instance) granted Southwest's motion, holding that the §1 exemption applied only to workers involved in 'actual transportation,' not those who merely handle goods.
- Saxon (appellant) appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
- The Court of Appeals reversed the District Court, finding that the act of loading cargo onto a vehicle for interstate transport is itself 'commerce' under the meaning of the FAA, thus making Saxon exempt.
- The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a conflict between the Circuit Courts on this issue.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the Federal Arbitration Act's §1 exemption for 'any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce' apply to an airline ramp supervisor who frequently loads and unloads cargo onto airplanes traveling across state lines?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Thomas
Yes, the Federal Arbitration Act's §1 exemption applies. An airline ramp supervisor who frequently loads and unloads cargo is a member of a 'class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.' The Court's analysis focused on the actual work performed by the class of workers, not the industry of the employer. The phrases 'workers' and 'engaged' direct attention to the performance of work. The Court reasoned that to be 'engaged in commerce' means to be directly involved in the cross-border transportation of goods. Citing precedent, the Court affirmed that the act of loading or unloading an interstate shipment is 'so closely related to interstate transportation as to be practically a part of it.' This conclusion is supported by the context of §1, which exempts transportation workers who play a 'direct and necessary role in the free flow of goods' across borders, a role that cargo loaders clearly fulfill.
Analysis:
This unanimous decision clarifies the scope of the FAA's §1 'transportation worker' exemption, broadening its application beyond employees who physically travel across state lines. The ruling establishes that workers whose duties are directly and physically integral to the process of interstate commerce, such as loading cargo, are exempt from mandatory arbitration under the FAA. This holding strengthens the position of employees in the logistics and transportation sectors who wish to bring class-action lawsuits in court rather than being forced into individual arbitration. The decision will likely influence future cases involving other categories of workers, such as last-mile delivery drivers and warehouse employees, who will argue their work is also part of the continuous flow of interstate commerce.
