Southern-Gulf Marine Co. No. 9. Inc. v. Camcraft, Inc.
410 So. 2d 1181, 1982 La. App. LEXIS 6771 (1982)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the doctrine of corporation by estoppel, a party who contracts with an entity as a corporation, thereby acknowledging and treating it as such, is prevented from later denying the entity's corporate existence to avoid contractual liability, unless the defect affects the party's substantial rights.
Facts:
- On December 6, 1978, Camcraft, Inc. entered into a letter of agreement to build a vessel for 'Southern-Gulf Marine Co. No. 9, Inc., a company to be formed.'
- On May 30, 1979, Camcraft and Southern-Gulf executed a formal Vessel Construction Contract, which represented Southern-Gulf as a Texas corporation, even though the entity had not yet been formally incorporated.
- Both parties proceeded to act in reliance on the contract, with Camcraft beginning to purchase components for the vessel.
- On February 15, 1980, Southern-Gulf was officially incorporated, but under the laws of the Cayman Islands, not Texas.
- In a letter dated February 21, 1980, Southern-Gulf's president, D.W. Barrett, informed Camcraft of the Cayman incorporation and stated that the new entity ratified and adopted the prior agreements.
- On February 22, 1980, Camcraft's president, Dudley Bowman, signed a written acceptance of the letter acknowledging the change in Southern-Gulf's legal status.
- Camcraft subsequently defaulted on its obligation to deliver the vessel.
Procedural Posture:
- Southern-Gulf Marine Co. No. 9, Inc. sued Camcraft, Inc. in a Louisiana trial court for breach of contract, seeking specific performance and damages.
- Camcraft filed a peremptory exception of no cause of action (a motion to dismiss), arguing the contract was void because Southern-Gulf did not exist as a Texas corporation when the contract was signed.
- The trial court sustained the exception and dismissed Southern-Gulf's lawsuit.
- Southern-Gulf, as appellant, appealed the trial court's dismissal to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the doctrine of corporation by estoppel prevent a party who has contracted with and treated an entity as a corporation from later challenging that entity's defective incorporation to avoid its obligations under the contract?
Opinions:
Majority - Doucet, Judge
Yes. The doctrine of corporation by estoppel prevents a party who has contracted with and treated an entity as a corporation from later challenging that entity's defective incorporation to avoid its obligations. A party who contracts with an entity as a corporation, incurring obligations in its favor, is estopped from denying its corporate existence when those obligations are sought to be enforced. The court reasoned that it would be contrary to good faith and justice to permit a party to 'play fast and loose' by treating an entity as a corporation to secure a contract and then denying its existence to escape performance. Because Camcraft dealt with Southern-Gulf as a corporation and its substantial rights were not affected by the subsequent incorporation in a different jurisdiction, which Camcraft acknowledged, Camcraft is estopped from using the initial lack of corporate status as a defense.
Analysis:
This case strongly affirms the equitable doctrine of corporation by estoppel, prioritizing the parties' intent and course of conduct over technical defects in corporate formation. It establishes that a party cannot use a technicality, such as a flawed or delayed incorporation, as a shield to escape a contract they willingly entered into and acted upon. The decision reinforces principles of good faith and fair dealing in commercial transactions, preventing parties from opportunistically voiding contracts that have become disadvantageous.
