South v. North

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
304 N.J. Super. 104, 698 A.2d 553 (1997)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A person can be considered a "household member" under New Jersey's Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, even without ever cohabitating with the victim, if the parties have a substantially integrated, family-like relationship that provides the perpetrator a special opportunity for abusive and controlling behavior.


Facts:

  • Lois South, age 74, and Greg North, age 73, had a dating relationship that ended seven years prior to the events in question.
  • South lived in an apartment with her daughter, Amy, and her grandson, Marc. North rented a different apartment in the same complex.
  • North and Amy South became romantically involved, were engaged to be married, and were the parents of Marc South.
  • For several years, North was a constant presence in Lois South's home, visiting at least three times a week, letting himself in, cooking, eating, attending family gatherings, and running errands for the family.
  • North had a volatile temper and engaged in a pattern of emotional and physical abuse against Lois South, including threatening to prevent her from seeing her grandson.
  • On March 25, 1997, North hit Lois South with his cane, pushed her out of her own apartment, and locked the door.

Procedural Posture:

  • Lois South filed a complaint against Greg North under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act.
  • A judge in the Superior Court of New Jersey granted Lois South a temporary restraining order (T.R.O.) against Greg North.
  • Lois South then sought a final restraining order in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, which is the court of first instance rendering this decision.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a defendant who never resided with the plaintiff but maintained a constant, long-term presence and a substantially integrated family relationship with the plaintiff's family qualify as a "household member" under New Jersey's Prevention of Domestic Violence Act?


Opinions:

Majority - DiCamillo, J.T.C.

Yes. A defendant who has a substantially integrated, family-like relationship with the plaintiff qualifies as a household member under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, even if they have never lived together. The Act does not define "household member," and the legislative intent was to broaden its protections beyond traditional cohabitants to cover unforeseen relationships where a special opportunity for abuse exists. The court must interpret the term liberally to provide victims with the maximum protection the law can offer. Drawing analogies from insurance, zoning, and tort law, the court determined that a "household" is not defined by a shared roof but by the quality and characteristics of the relationship, such as its stability, permanence, and degree of integration. Here, North's status as the plaintiff's grandson's father and daughter's fiancé, combined with his unlimited access to the home and deep involvement in their daily lives, created a de facto family and a "substantially integrated family relationship." This relationship provided North with a special opportunity for abusive and controlling behavior, placing him within the intended scope of the Act.



Analysis:

This decision significantly broadens the jurisdictional reach of New Jersey's Prevention of Domestic Violence Act by establishing that cohabitation is not a prerequisite for being considered a "household member." It moves the analysis from a rigid, location-based standard to a more flexible, relationship-based inquiry. The precedent requires courts to examine the qualitative nature of the parties' interactions, focusing on whether a "family-like setting" or "substantially integrated relationship" exists. This expanded definition allows the Act to protect victims in non-traditional family structures where an abuser, despite living elsewhere, is deeply enmeshed in the victim's life and uses that connection to exert control and abuse.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query South v. North (1997) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.