Slay v. Gose
233 S.W. 348, 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 881 (1921)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The power of sale granted in a deed of trust is a power coupled with an interest, which survives the death of the grantor. A non-judicial foreclosure sale conducted pursuant to such a power after the grantor's death is valid and extinguishes the equity of redemption held by the grantor's estate.
Facts:
- On November 29, 1917, T. G. Williams conveyed land to E. Slay, Sr., who in return executed promissory notes secured by a vendor's lien and deeds of trust.
- The debt included a senior note and three junior notes held by S. M. Gose and J. M. Scott, with the junior deed of trust containing a power of sale upon default.
- On December 2, 1918, E. Slay, Sr. died intestate without having made any payments on the notes, leaving behind a wife, minor children, and an insolvent estate. The property was the family homestead.
- With one of the junior notes past due, the trustee, at the request of Gose and Scott, sold the land at a public sale on January 7, 1919, pursuant to the power of sale in the junior deed of trust.
- Gose and Scott purchased the property at this trustee's sale.
- On January 2, 1920, Bettie Slay, the widow of Slay, Sr., acting as the community administrator of his estate, purported to convey the same land to J. J. Ingram.
- Ingram offered to pay Gose and Scott the full amount of the indebtedness on the property, but they refused the payment, asserting they had already acquired title through the trustee's sale.
Procedural Posture:
- S. M. Gose initiated a trespass to try title suit against E. J. Slay, Jr. in the district court.
- J. J. Ingram intervened in the suit, claiming ownership of the tract in dispute and filed a cross-action against Gose.
- The case was tried before the judge of the 43rd Judicial District Court without a jury.
- The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, S. M. Gose, concluding that the trustee's sale under the junior deed of trust was valid and conveyed title to Gose.
- J. J. Ingram, the intervener, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Court of Civil Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a foreclosure sale conducted by a trustee under a power of sale in a junior deed of trust, occurring after the death of the grantor, valid to convey title and extinguish the equity of redemption of the grantor's estate?
Opinions:
Majority - Dunklin, J.
Yes, a foreclosure sale under a power of sale in a deed of trust is valid even after the grantor's death and extinguishes the estate's equity of redemption. The court reasoned that the power of sale given in a deed of trust is a 'power coupled with an interest,' which means it does not terminate upon the death of the grantor. Citing Weiner v. Zweib, the court affirmed that a sale conducted by a trustee according to the terms of the instrument effectively passes title. Therefore, the trustee's sale on January 7, 1919, validly transferred Slay, Sr.'s title and cut off his estate's equity of redemption. Consequently, when the widow attempted to sell the property to Ingram a year later, the estate had no title or equity left to convey, rendering that sale a nullity. Gose, as the new owner after the foreclosure, had the right to redeem the property from the senior lien, which he did, solidifying his title.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the legal principle in Texas that a power of sale in a deed of trust is a durable right that is not extinguished by the borrower's death. It provides significant security for lenders by allowing them to proceed with non-judicial foreclosure without being entangled in probate proceedings, which can be lengthy and complex. The ruling clarifies that a valid foreclosure sale definitively cuts off the redemption rights of the deceased borrower's heirs and estate. This precedent streamlines the process for secured creditors to recover their collateral, reinforcing the strength and efficiency of the deed of trust as a financing instrument in the state.
Unlock the full brief for Slay v. Gose