Shankar v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court
143 T.C. No. 5, 2014 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 36, 143 T.C. 140 (2014)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

The fair market value of property, such as an airline ticket, received by redeeming rewards points from a financial institution is includible in the recipient's gross income under § 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, as it constitutes an accession to wealth.


Facts:

  • During 2009, Parimal Shankar maintained a bank account with Citibank, which awarded him 'Thank You Points'.
  • On February 27, 2009, Mr. Shankar redeemed 50,000 of these points to purchase a restricted coach class airline ticket.
  • Citibank determined the fair market value of the airline ticket to be $668.
  • In 2009, Mr. Shankar's wife, Vinitra Trivedi, was an active participant in a section 403(b) annuity purchase plan provided by her employer.
  • Mr. Shankar and Ms. Trivedi made a combined contribution of $11,000 to a qualified retirement arrangement (IRA) for the 2009 tax year.
  • The couple's modified adjusted gross income for 2009 was $255,397, which exceeded the statutory threshold for deducting IRA contributions when a spouse is an active participant in an employer's retirement plan.

Procedural Posture:

  • Parimal Shankar and Vinitra Trivedi (petitioners) filed a joint Form 1040 federal income tax return for 2009.
  • Citibank issued a Form 1099-MISC to Mr. Shankar and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), reporting $668 in 'Other income,' which the petitioners did not include on their return.
  • The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (respondent) issued a notice of deficiency for $563, increasing the petitioners' gross income by $668 and disallowing their $11,000 IRA deduction.
  • The petitioners challenged the deficiency by filing a petition in the U.S. Tax Court.
  • The respondent filed an amendment to the answer, increasing the claimed deficiency to $6,883 based on a recomputation of the petitioners' Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does the fair market value of an airline ticket obtained by redeeming 'Thank You Points' from a bank constitute gross income taxable to the recipient under § 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code?


Opinions:

Majority - Halpern, Judge

Yes, the value of an airline ticket obtained by redeeming bank rewards points constitutes taxable gross income. The court reasoned that § 61(a) defines gross income broadly to include 'all income from whatever source derived.' Citing Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., the court defined income as an 'undeniable accession to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion.' The receipt of the airline ticket, valued at $668, met this definition. The court distinguished these rewards from frequent flyer miles earned through business travel, which the IRS has a policy of not taxing, by treating the points as a premium for maintaining a bank account, analogous to taxable interest. Additionally, the court upheld the disallowance of the petitioners' $11,000 IRA deduction, finding that because Ms. Trivedi was an 'active participant' in an employer retirement plan and their joint income exceeded the statutory phase-out range under § 219(g), the deduction was prohibited. The court rejected the petitioners' constitutional challenge, applying rational basis review and finding the limitation reasonably related to Congress's purpose of incentivizing retirement savings for those not covered by employer-sponsored plans.



Analysis:

This case provides a significant clarification on the tax treatment of modern loyalty and reward programs, specifically distinguishing bank rewards from frequent flyer miles. By applying the foundational Glenshaw Glass 'accession to wealth' doctrine, the court affirmed that redeeming points from a financial institution for goods or services is a realization event that creates taxable income. This holding serves as a key precedent for the taxability of non-cash benefits from banks, treating them as akin to interest income rather than a non-taxable rebate or price adjustment. The decision reinforces a broad interpretation of gross income and puts taxpayers on notice that many 'free' rewards have tax consequences.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Shankar v. Comm'r (2014) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.