Securities v. World-Wide Coin Investments, Ltd.
567 F. Supp. 724 (1983)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A public company and its officers violate federal securities laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, the Williams Act, Section 14(a) proxy rules, Section 16(a) insider trading rules, and Section 13(a) periodic reporting requirements, by failing to maintain accurate books and records, implement adequate internal accounting controls, make timely and truthful disclosures in required SEC filings and communications to shareholders, and by engaging in fraudulent transactions with overvalued assets.
Facts:
- World-Wide Coin Investments, Ltd. (World-Wide), a Delaware corporation, was engaged in the wholesale and retail sale of rare coins, precious metals, gold, and silver, with its common stock registered with the SEC and listed on the Boston Stock Exchange.
- In July 1979, Joseph H. Hale acquired 51% of World-Wide's common stock from John Hamrick for 75 cents per share, subsequently becoming the controlling shareholder, chairman of the board, chief executive officer, and president.
- As part of Hale's purchase, he and Hamrick entered into a consulting agreement where World-Wide would pay Hamrick a consulting fee of $1,000 per month for 15 months and $5,000 per month until certain loans were repaid and guarantees removed.
- On July 24, 1979, Hale persuaded the board of directors to adopt a resolution authorizing the issuance of 300,000 additional shares of common stock at 75 cents per share, payable in cash, coins, or rare medals, with the condition that an outside appraisal be obtained if paid in non-cash assets.
- On or about September 15, 1979, Hale sold bicentennial and other commemorative medals to World-Wide in consideration for the 300,000 shares, valuing them at an inflated $225,000, despite advice from World-Wide's vice president and numismatist, Jerry Bickers, that the medals had little market value beyond scrap, and without obtaining the required outside appraisal.
- On July 30, 1979, Hale commenced a public tender offer to purchase the remaining common shares of World-Wide stock for 75 cents per share, mailing an offering circular he personally prepared without counsel to the remaining 401 shareholders.
- Hale appointed Jones and Seibert, employees of his other private corporations, to comprise, along with himself, the three-member World-Wide board of directors, without shareholder approval.
- From July 1979 onward, World-Wide's internal accounting controls and accounting procedures deteriorated significantly, including the termination of its chief financial officer, failure to keep general ledgers or reconcile bank accounts, and ignoring repeated warnings from independent auditors (Kanes, Benator & Co. and May, Zima & Co.) about material weaknesses in its control systems.
Procedural Posture:
- The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) began its investigation into World-Wide Coin Investments, Ltd.'s activities in early 1981.
- In August 1981, the SEC filed a complaint in federal district court against World-Wide, Joseph H. Hale, and Floyd Seibert (and initially Joe Gregory Jones) for violations of federal securities laws, seeking a permanent injunction, a full accounting, and disclosure of wrongfully received benefits.
- Prior to the trial of this case, defendants tendered a permanent undertaking to the district court, admitting their failure to file certain reports and tardiness in filing others, and agreeing to timely file future reports as required, but denying other wrongdoing.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Did World-Wide Coin Investments, Ltd., and its officers, Joseph H. Hale and Floyd Seibert, violate various provisions of the federal securities laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, the Williams Act, Section 14(a) proxy rules, Section 16(a) insider trading rules, and Section 13(a) periodic reporting requirements, through their actions and omissions following Hale's acquisition of control?
Opinions:
Majority - Vining, District Judge
Yes, World-Wide Coin Investments, Ltd., and its officers, Joseph H. Hale and Floyd Seibert, violated various provisions of the federal securities laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, the Williams Act, Section 14(a) proxy rules, Section 16(a) insider trading rules, and Section 13(a) periodic reporting requirements, through their actions and omissions following Hale's acquisition of control. The court found World-Wide, aided and abetted by Hale and Seibert, in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Section 13(b)(2)(A) and (B) due to chaotic internal recordkeeping and non-existent internal accounting controls. This included a lack of source documents for $1.7 million in checks, overvalued medallions entered on the books, lax security measures, and a complete absence of segregation of duties. The court explicitly rejected the defendants' argument for a scienter (intent) requirement under the FCPA, stating its inconsistency with the statutory language and the purpose of preventing misapplication of assets. It also dismissed a cost/benefit defense, noting that ignoring warnings leading to corporate demise negates such an argument. The defendants further violated Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 through material misrepresentations and omissions with scienter, particularly in Hale's misleading tender offer circular and the falsified corporate minute book concerning the overvalued stock-for-medallion swap. Violations of the Williams Act (Sections 13(d), 14(d)(1), 14(e), 14(f) and associated rules) were established by Hale's failure to file required schedules (13D, 14D-1) and the material misrepresentations in his tender offer circular and failures to disclose changes in board composition. World-Wide's proxy solicitations violated Section 14(a) and Rules 14a-6 and 14a-9 through unfiled materials containing misleading statements about director independence, related-party transactions, and the company's financial condition. Hale's late Form 3 filing and failure to file Form 4 reports, along with Seibert's complete failure to file, constituted violations of Section 16(a) and Rule 16a-1, with World-Wide aiding and abetting. Finally, World-Wide's numerous late and inaccurate periodic reports (10K, 10Q, 8K) violated Section 13(a) and related rules, which Hale and Seibert aided and abetted. The court determined these were not mere technical violations but a "continuing, fraudulent course of business" and a "total disregard for the principles of full and fair disclosure," warranting a permanent injunction, a full fraud accounting, and disgorgement of wrongfully received benefits.
Analysis:
This case significantly broadened the enforcement scope of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), particularly its accounting provisions, by establishing that a scienter (intent) element is not required for violations and that the requirements apply to companies of all sizes. The ruling underscores the SEC's authority to regulate a wide range of corporate financial management and reporting practices, emphasizing that accurate record-keeping and robust internal controls are fundamental to investor protection and market integrity, extending beyond traditional anti-fraud disclosure requirements. This decision reinforces the importance for all public companies to diligently adhere to accounting standards and disclosure obligations, warning that even a perceived cost-benefit justification for lax controls will not excuse severe systemic failures that lead to corporate detriment and a pattern of ongoing violations. Consequently, it highlighted the broad remedial powers of the courts in securities fraud cases, including injunctions, full accounting, and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains.
