Schmidt v. Commissioner
55 T.C. 335, 1970 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 28 (1970)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A capital loss resulting from a complete corporate liquidation is generally only recognized in the taxable year when the final liquidating distribution is made, as the precise amount of the loss is not fixed and determinable until the transaction is closed.
Facts:
- Ethel M. Schmidt owned 812 shares of stock in the Highland Co., a construction business, with a total tax basis of $62,440.
- On January 4, 1965, the stockholders of Highland Co. adopted a resolution to completely dissolve and liquidate the corporation.
- During 1965, Highland Co. sold substantially all of its operating assets, including its machinery and equipment, and effectively ceased its construction business.
- As part of the liquidation, Highland Co. made a pro rata cash distribution to its stockholders in 1965, from which Schmidt received $26,406.51.
- At the end of 1965, the company had not fully dissolved and still retained significant assets, including cash, accounts receivable, and municipal bonds known as 'street warrants,' which were yet to be collected and distributed.
- In a separate transaction in 1965, Schmidt sold a property she owned personally, realizing a long-term capital gain of $24,059.50.
Procedural Posture:
- Ethel M. Schmidt filed her 1965 individual Federal income tax return, claiming a long-term capital loss of $10,440.36 on her Highland Co. stock.
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Respondent) disallowed the loss deduction, asserting that the loss was not sustained within the 1965 taxable year, and determined an income tax deficiency of $1,954.33.
- Schmidt (Petitioner) filed a petition with the Tax Court of the United States to challenge the Commissioner's deficiency determination.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a shareholder sustain a deductible capital loss in a taxable year when a corporation in the process of complete liquidation makes a partial distribution, if it is reasonably certain that further liquidating distributions will be made in subsequent years?
Opinions:
Majority - Bruce, Judge
No. A shareholder does not sustain a deductible capital loss from a complete corporate liquidation until the year in which the final distribution is made. The general rule is that losses are recognized only after the corporation makes its final distribution, because until that point, the precise amount of the loss is indefinite and uncertain. The court's reasoning followed several lines. First, under Section 331(a)(1) governing complete liquidations, precedent like Dresser v. United States establishes that where further liquidating dividends are reasonably certain, a loss cannot be claimed until the final amount is distributed. This prevents taxpayers from selecting the most advantageous year to claim an estimated loss. The court distinguished cases like Commissioner v. Winthrop, where the value of remaining assets was ascertainable with reasonable certainty. Here, the value of uncollected receivables and warrants was uncertain. Second, the court rejected the argument for a loss from a partial liquidation under Section 346(a)(1). It held that for a series of distributions in a complete liquidation, the distributions are first applied against the shareholder's basis, and any loss is only recognized upon the final distribution. A taxpayer is not permitted to split an anticipated loss. Finally, a deduction under Section 165 was improper because the loss was not from a 'closed and completed' transaction, as the liquidation was ongoing and the stock was not yet worthless.
Analysis:
This decision reaffirms the 'open transaction' doctrine as it applies to losses from corporate liquidations, establishing a bright-line rule that prioritizes certainty over reasonable estimation. The court's holding prevents taxpayers from accelerating a capital loss to offset a capital gain in a particular year before the loss amount is definitively fixed. This case clarifies that even if a loss is virtually certain to occur, its deductibility is postponed until the final liquidating distribution makes the amount actual and present, not merely prospective. This precedent solidifies the IRS's position against the premature recognition of losses in multi-year liquidations and guides tax planning by requiring patience until the liquidation process is fully concluded.
