Sandusky County Democratic Party v. Blackwell
340 F. Supp. 2d 810 (2004)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A stay of an injunction pending appeal is an extraordinary remedy governed by a four-factor test, requiring the moving party to demonstrate a strong likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury absent a stay, that the stay will not substantially injure other parties, and that the public interest favors the stay.
Facts:
- The U.S. Congress passed the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) to establish standards for federal elections.
- J. Kenneth Blackwell, in his capacity as Ohio Secretary of State, issued Directive 2004-33 concerning the casting and counting of provisional ballots.
- Directive 2004-33 instructed that a provisional ballot cast by a voter outside of their specific, assigned home precinct would not be counted, even if cast within the voter's county of registration.
- The Sandusky County Democratic Party, the Ohio Democratic Party, and three labor organizations contended that this "home precinct" rule violated HAVA's provisional voting provisions.
- The legal dispute arose shortly before the November 2, 2004 State and National elections, creating time-sensitive pressure to resolve the issue.
Procedural Posture:
- The Sandusky County Democratic Party and other plaintiffs sued J. Kenneth Blackwell, Ohio Secretary of State, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
- Plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, arguing Blackwell's Directive 2004-33 violated the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).
- The District Court granted the preliminary injunction, finding the directive violated HAVA and ordering Blackwell to draft and submit a new, compliant directive by a set deadline.
- Defendant Blackwell and several intervenors filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
- Defendant Blackwell and the intervenors then filed motions in the District Court to stay the injunction pending the outcome of their appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a party seeking a stay of an injunction pending appeal meet its burden by arguing that the underlying legal issues are complex and will have a significant electoral impact, without substantively addressing the four-factor test requiring a showing of likely success on the merits and irreparable harm?
Opinions:
Majority - Carr, District Judge
No. A party seeking a stay pending appeal does not meet its burden by merely pointing to the complexity of the issues without substantively engaging with the required four-factor test. The court found that Blackwell failed to make a strong showing that he was likely to succeed on the merits of his appeal, particularly on the question of whether his directive violated HAVA by creating an impermissible barrier to voting. Blackwell also failed to demonstrate that he or the state would suffer irreparable harm by being required to draft a HAVA-compliant directive, as this task was not unduly burdensome. Furthermore, the court reasoned that denying the stay would not harm other parties and that the public interest strongly favored denying the stay to ensure that a legally compliant voting directive was prepared and ready for the impending election, thereby preventing delay and protecting the fundamental right to vote.
Analysis:
This order emphasizes the high threshold required to obtain a stay of an injunction pending appeal, particularly in the context of election law where time is of the essence. It serves as a strong precedent that mere conclusory statements about a case's complexity are insufficient; a movant must rigorously apply the four-factor test from Hilton v. Braunskill. The decision underscores the judiciary's role in protecting fundamental rights like voting by refusing to delay remedies for potential violations. This ensures that administrative challenges do not effectively disenfranchise voters through procedural delays close to an election.
Unlock the full brief for Sandusky County Democratic Party v. Blackwell