Lexplug logoLexplug

Sam Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC (072742)

Supreme Court of New Jersey
220 N.J. 289, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 38, 106 A.3d 449 (2015)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

The "ABC" test, derived from the New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Act, governs the determination of whether a plaintiff is an employee or an independent contractor for purposes of the New Jersey Wage Payment Law and the Wage and Hour Law.


Facts:

  • Plaintiffs (Hargrove, Hall, and Eusebio) worked as delivery drivers transporting mattresses for Sleepy's, LLC.
  • The drivers signed an "Independent Driver Agreement" with Sleepy's.
  • Sleepy's classified the plaintiffs as independent contractors rather than employees based on this agreement.
  • Plaintiffs delivered mattresses ordered by Sleepy's customers as part of Sleepy's business operations.
  • Because of their classification as independent contractors, the plaintiffs did not receive employee benefits such as health insurance or medical leave.
  • Plaintiffs claimed they suffered financial losses and contended that the misclassification was a ruse to avoid payment of benefits.
  • Plaintiffs asserted that this arrangement violated state wage laws.

Procedural Posture:

  • Plaintiffs sued Defendant in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging violations of state wage laws.
  • The United States District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant, ruling that Plaintiffs were independent contractors under the federal ERISA test.
  • Plaintiffs appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
  • The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit filed a petition with the New Jersey Supreme Court to certify a question of law regarding the correct employment test.
  • The New Jersey Supreme Court granted the petition for certification.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Under New Jersey law, which legal test must a court apply to determine a worker's employment status for claims arising under the Wage Payment Law and the Wage and Hour Law?


Opinions:

Majority - Judge Cuff

Yes, the "ABC" test applies. The Court held that any employment-status dispute arising under the Wage Payment Law (WPL) and Wage and Hour Law (WHL) must be resolved by utilizing the "ABC" test set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6). The Court reasoned that both statutes are remedial legislation designed to ensure income security for workers and should be liberally construed. While the WPL lacks a specific definition regulation, the Department of Labor has long applied the "ABC" test to the WHL. The Court rejected the common law "right to control" test as too narrow and the federal "economic realities" test as too unpredictable. By adopting the "ABC" test, the Court ensured consistency with the Unemployment Compensation Act and placed the burden on the employer to prove independent contractor status.



Analysis:

This decision significantly impacts New Jersey employment law by establishing a very high bar for employers to classify workers as independent contractors. By adopting the strict "ABC" test for wage claims, the Court unified the standard across unemployment, wage payment, and wage and hour laws, rejecting the more flexible federal standards or common law agency tests. This ruling creates a presumption of employment status that is difficult to rebut, likely resulting in more workers being classified as employees entitled to benefits and wage protections. It specifically affects the "gig economy" and logistics sectors where independent contractor models are prevalent.

G

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Sam Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC (072742) (2015)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"