Russell v. Russell
2007 WL 59338, 2007 Mo. LEXIS 6, 210 S.W.3d 191 (2007)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
To modify the schedule of a joint physical custody arrangement under Missouri statute § 452.410.1, a court must find that a change in circumstances of the child or custodian has occurred and that the modification is in the child's best interests; a showing of a 'substantial' change in circumstances is not required.
Facts:
- After their marriage was dissolved in 2000, Mother and Father were awarded joint legal and physical custody of their child, born in 1997.
- The original custody order gave Father physical custody every weekend from Friday evening to Monday morning, as Mother worked part-time on weekends and the child was not yet in school.
- Since the dissolution, Mother's employment changed to a full-time, Monday through Friday schedule.
- The child, who was three at the time of the dissolution, began attending school full-time on weekdays.
- Father began having National Guard duty one weekend per month and was deployed on active duty for nearly a year, during which the original schedule was not followed.
- Father works on Friday nights, requiring his sister to care for the child during a portion of his designated custody time.
Procedural Posture:
- Mother filed a motion to modify the original dissolution judgment in the circuit court (trial court).
- After a hearing, the trial court granted the motion in part, finding a change of circumstances and modifying the physical custody schedule, child support, and attorney's fees.
- Father, as appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Missouri Court of Appeals.
- After issuing an opinion, the Court of Appeals transferred the case to the Supreme Court of Missouri.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does Missouri law require a showing of a 'substantial' change in circumstances to modify the parenting time schedule in a joint physical custody arrangement?
Opinions:
Majority - Wolff, C.J.
No. A modification of a joint physical custody schedule does not require a 'substantial' change in circumstances; the statutory standard only requires a showing of a 'change in circumstances' and that the modification is in the 'best interests of the child.' The court reasoned that the word 'substantial' does not appear in the governing statute, § 452.410.1. This higher standard was a judicial creation from an era when sole custody was the norm, and changing custody was a drastic measure implicating the finality of judgments. The court distinguished modern joint custody arrangements, where schedule adjustments are less drastic and more akin to modifying visitation. Therefore, for simple rearrangements of parenting time in a joint custody situation, courts should not impose the extra-statutory 'substantial' requirement. Applying this standard, the changes in Mother's work schedule, the child's enrollment in school, and Father's military duties constituted a sufficient 'change in circumstances' to warrant modification in the child's best interest.
Analysis:
This decision significantly clarifies and lowers the threshold for modifying parenting schedules in joint custody cases in Missouri. By explicitly rejecting the judicially-imposed 'substantial change' standard for schedule modifications, the court promotes flexibility and prioritizes the child's best interests over the rigid finality of judgments. This ruling makes it easier for parents to adapt custody arrangements to the evolving needs of their children and their own life circumstances without having to meet an arduous legal standard designed for more drastic custody battles. It signals a shift in legal doctrine to better align with the modern statutory preference for joint custody.
Unlock the full brief for Russell v. Russell