Roth Steel Tube Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
620 F.2d 1176, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17749, 45 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1568 (1980)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A parent corporation's voluntary cancellation of a debt owed by its wholly-owned subsidiary is generally treated as a non-deductible contribution to the subsidiary's capital, not a deductible bad debt loss, unless the taxpayer can meet the heavy burden of proving the debt was actually worthless and uncollectible.
Facts:
- For many years, Roth Steel Tube Company (Roth) sold steel tubing to a toy manufacturer named Remco American (American).
- In January 1971, American's parent company, Remco Industries, filed for bankruptcy protection, placing American in financial jeopardy.
- On April 1, 1971, Roth, as American's largest creditor, conditionally offered to settle American's outstanding debt of over $327,000 for a 32.5% payment.
- In late April 1971, rather than simply accepting a settlement, Roth agreed to acquire all of American's stock from Remco Industries, making American its wholly-owned subsidiary, effective April 30, 1971.
- After the acquisition, American continued as a going concern, its sales increased, and it paid Roth approximately $500,000 on its accounts during the tax year ending April 30, 1972.
- Approximately $150,000 of the payments were applied to the pre-acquisition debt.
- On March 31, 1972, Roth charged off the remaining pre-acquisition balance of $172,443 against its bad debt reserve as a partially worthless debt.
Procedural Posture:
- Roth Steel Tube Company claimed a deduction for a $172,443 addition to its bad debt reserve on its tax return for the year ended April 30, 1972.
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed the deduction.
- Roth petitioned the U.S. Tax Court to challenge the Commissioner's determination.
- The Tax Court ruled in favor of the Commissioner, upholding the disallowance.
- Roth, as petitioner, appealed the Tax Court's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a parent corporation's voluntary cancellation of a debt owed by its financially recovering, wholly-owned subsidiary qualify as a partially worthless debt for which the parent can take a bad debt deduction under Section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code?
Opinions:
Majority - Engel, J.
No. A parent corporation's voluntary cancellation of a debt owed by its subsidiary is not a deductible worthless debt but rather a contribution to capital, especially when the taxpayer cannot prove the debt was actually uncollectible. The taxpayer bears a 'heavy burden' to show that the Commissioner's determination to disallow the deduction was unreasonable and arbitrary. Roth failed to meet this burden because it did not demonstrate the debt was truly worthless. There was no binding composition agreement with other creditors forcing the cancellation, and Roth's initial settlement offer was not followed. Most importantly, a taxpayer cannot voluntarily render a collectible debt uncollectible and then claim a deduction. Here, the debtor, American, was a going concern with improving business prospects and the financial backing of its new parent, Roth. The transaction was not at arm's length, and Roth's forgiveness of the debt directly increased the net worth of its subsidiary, making the transaction a capital contribution, the loss from which could only be realized when the shares in the subsidiary are sold or become worthless.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the high level of scrutiny applied to non-arm's-length transactions between related corporate entities for tax purposes. It solidifies the principle that a parent's forgiveness of a subsidiary's debt is presumptively a capital contribution, not a deductible loss. The case underscores the 'heavy burden' a taxpayer must overcome to challenge the Commissioner's discretion, making it difficult for parent companies to use bad debt deductions as a way to finance or recapitalize struggling subsidiaries. This precedent effectively prevents corporations from deducting what are, in economic substance, capital investments.
