Lexplug logoLexplug

Rogers v. Kaylor

Supreme Court of Arkansas
227 Ark. 468, 1957 Ark. LEXIS 341, 299 S.W.2d 204 (1957)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

Under the Rule in Shelley's Case, if an instrument grants a freehold estate to a person and, in the same instrument, a remainder is limited to that person's heirs, the grantee takes a fee simple absolute, not a life estate.


Facts:

  • In 1908, John and Callie Tenniswood conveyed three lots to their daughter, Johnie Tenniswood.
  • The granting and habendum clauses of the deed stated the conveyance was 'unto the said Johnie Tenniswood during her natural life, and unto heirs and assigns forever.'
  • Johnie Tenniswood, later known as Mrs. Johnie Rogers, subsequently executed warranty deeds that purported to convey the full fee simple title of the lots to other parties.
  • The appellees in this case derive their title from the grantees of the deeds executed by Mrs. Rogers.
  • Mrs. Johnie Tenniswood Rogers later died intestate.
  • The appellants are the children and legal heirs of Mrs. Rogers.

Procedural Posture:

  • The children and heirs at law of Mrs. Johnie Tenniswood Rogers (appellants) filed suit against the current property owners (appellees) in a trial court to recover possession of the three lots.
  • The trial court ruled in favor of the appellees, holding that Mrs. Rogers had obtained a fee simple title under the Rule in Shelley's Case.
  • The appellants appealed the trial court's decision to the Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a conveyance to a grantee 'during her natural life, and unto heirs and assigns forever' grant the grantee a fee simple absolute under the Rule in Shelley's Case, rather than a life estate with a remainder to her heirs?


Opinions:

Majority - Ed. E. McFaddin

Yes. A conveyance to a grantee for her natural life and then to her heirs grants the grantee a fee simple absolute under the Rule in Shelley's Case. The court found this case to be a 'perfect application' of the classic rule, which holds that when a grantee takes a freehold estate (like a life estate) and the same instrument creates a remainder interest in the grantee's heirs, the two estates merge, and the grantee takes the fee simple. The court relied on its landmark precedent, Hardage v. Stroope, which established that when the word 'heirs' is used as a word of limitation (defining the grantee's estate) rather than purchase (identifying specific future takers), the rule applies. Therefore, Johnie Tenniswood Rogers received a fee simple title, which she had the full right to convey.



Analysis:

This case serves as a straightforward reaffirmation of the common law Rule in Shelley's Case in Arkansas jurisprudence. It demonstrates the rule's formalistic power to override the likely intent of a grantor who wishes to create a life estate followed by a remainder in the life tenant's heirs. The decision reinforces that specific, technical language in property conveyances can trigger ancient legal doctrines with significant consequences, solidifying the precedent set by Hardage v. Stroope. For practitioners, it highlights the importance of precise drafting to avoid unintended outcomes created by such 'traps for the unwary' embedded in property law.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Rogers v. Kaylor (1957) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Rogers v. Kaylor