Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
23 L. Ed. 2d 360, 395 U.S. 352, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 3100 (1969)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act governs incidents occurring on artificial island drilling rigs, treating them as federal enclaves and adopting the law of the adjacent state as surrogate federal law. The Death on the High Seas Act, a maritime law, does not apply to such incidents because these fixed structures are not vessels and the accidents do not occur 'on the high seas' for the purposes of admiralty jurisdiction.
Facts:
- Dore and Rodrigue were two men working on artificial island drilling rigs located on the Outer Continental Shelf, off the coast of Louisiana.
- In one incident, Dore was working on a crane mounted on an artificial island that was unloading a barge.
- The crane collapsed and toppled onto the barge, killing Dore.
- In a separate incident, Rodrigue was performing a test high on a derrick on another artificial island.
- Rodrigue fell from the derrick to his death on the floor of the drilling platform.
Procedural Posture:
- The families of Dore and Rodrigue each filed wrongful death suits in separate U.S. District Courts in Louisiana.
- The suits alleged claims under both the federal Death on the High Seas Act (Seas Act) and Louisiana state law, as made applicable by the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (Lands Act).
- In the Dore case, the District Court granted summary judgment, holding that the Seas Act provided the exclusive remedy and limited recovery to pecuniary loss.
- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the District Court's decision in the Dore case.
- In the Rodrigue case, the District Court dismissed the civil actions based on the Lands Act and Louisiana law, also finding the Seas Act to be the exclusive remedy.
- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal in the Rodrigue case, citing its prior decision in Dore.
- The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review both decisions.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the federal Death on the High Seas Act provide the exclusive remedy for wrongful deaths occurring on artificial island drilling rigs located on the Outer Continental Shelf, thereby preempting state law remedies made applicable by the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Justice White
No. The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, not the Death on the High Seas Act, provides the governing remedy for deaths on artificial islands, and it incorporates the law of the adjacent state. Congress explicitly chose to treat these structures as federal enclaves within a state rather than as vessels subject to maritime law. The legislative history shows a deliberate decision to reject the application of admiralty law to these platforms to ensure workers had access to more comprehensive 'social laws,' like state tort remedies, due to their close ties to the adjacent state. Since these artificial islands are not vessels and are outside traditional admiralty jurisdiction, the Death on the High Seas Act does not apply of its own force, and therefore does not create an inconsistency that would oust the state law adopted by the Lands Act.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the legal status of fixed platforms on the Outer Continental Shelf, establishing that they are to be treated as land-based federal enclaves rather than vessels at sea. By holding that the Lands Act and its adoption of adjacent state law applies, the Court significantly expanded the remedies available to injured workers and their families, who could now recover damages available under state tort law that were unavailable under the more restrictive federal maritime law. This ruling created a clear jurisdictional line, preventing the application of traditional admiralty principles to these unique industrial structures and ensuring that the law governing them reflects their connection to the adjacent shore, not the open sea.
Unlock the full brief for Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.