Rick v. West
1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3455, 228 N.Y.S.2d 195, 34 Misc. 2d 1002 (1962)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A restrictive covenant limiting land to residential use remains enforceable by a property owner who relied upon it at purchase, and will not be rendered unenforceable by either a general exception clause for 'unforeseen conditions' when the proposed change fundamentally alters the community's character, or by alleged changes in the surrounding neighborhood that are not so substantial as to destroy the covenant's value to the protected property.
Facts:
- In 1946, Chester Rick purchased a 62-acre tract of land and in 1947, he filed a declaration imposing restrictive covenants limiting the entire tract to single-family residential use to create a planned community.
- The declaration contained a clause allowing the seller to permit exceptions for 'special unforeseen conditions' with written consent, provided the 'spirit and intent' of the covenants were maintained.
- In 1955, the defendant contracted to purchase a half-acre lot from Rick, relying on the residential restrictions.
- In January 1956, before conveying the deed, Rick filed a revised declaration that maintained the residential-use restriction.
- In September 1956, Rick conveyed the lot to the defendant, whose deed referenced the covenants.
- In 1959, Rick sold the remainder of the tract to the plaintiffs.
- In 1961, the plaintiffs contracted to sell 15 acres of the restricted tract to Peekskill Hospital for the construction of a community hospital.
- The defendant refused to release the covenant or consent to the sale, preventing the transaction from proceeding.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiffs, the owners of a 62-acre tract, filed an action for a declaratory judgment in a New York trial court against the defendant, a homeowner within the tract.
- Plaintiffs sought a judgment permitting the sale of 15 acres for a hospital, declaring the restrictive covenants unenforceable, and limiting the defendant to pecuniary damages.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a restrictive covenant limiting land to single-family residential use remain enforceable by a homeowner who relied on it, despite the developer's successors claiming an 'unforeseen conditions' exception for a hospital and alleging changes in the surrounding neighborhood?
Opinions:
Majority - Clare J. Hoyt, J.
Yes. A restrictive covenant for residential use remains enforceable by a homeowner who relied on it, and it cannot be voided by claims of 'unforeseen conditions' or minor neighborhood changes. The court reasoned that the exception clause for 'special unforeseen conditions' was not intended to permit changes that fundamentally alter the residential character of the community, such as building a hospital. To interpret it otherwise would render all covenants meaningless and subject to the seller's unilateral repeal. The court also found the 'changed conditions' argument untenable, as the significant changes cited by the plaintiffs occurred before the revised covenants were filed, and any subsequent changes were minor and did not destroy the value or usefulness of the covenant to the defendant. Citing precedent, the court refused to balance the equities between the public good of a hospital and the defendant's private property right, holding that the defendant, having purchased her property in reliance on the covenant, has an absolute right to enforce it.
Analysis:
This case strongly affirms the durability of restrictive covenants in real property law, establishing that they will be strictly enforced to protect the bargained-for rights of property owners. It narrowly interprets exception clauses, preventing them from being used as a loophole to subvert the primary purpose of a covenant. The decision also sets a high bar for the 'changed conditions' doctrine, requiring proof that changes have effectively destroyed the covenant's benefit, thereby preserving the stability and character of planned communities against external pressures and subsequent development.
