Richards et al. v. United States et al.
369 U.S. 1 (1962)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), when a government employee's negligent act or omission occurs in one state and causes injury in another, a federal court must apply the whole law, including the choice-of-law rules, of the state where the act or omission occurred.
Facts:
- The Federal Aviation Agency, a U.S. government entity, allegedly failed to enforce federal aviation statutes and regulations at an American Airlines overhaul depot in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
- As a result of this alleged negligence, an American Airlines plane departed from Tulsa, Oklahoma, en route to New York City.
- The airplane crashed in the state of Missouri.
- Several passengers were killed in the crash.
- At the time, Missouri's wrongful death statute imposed a $15,000 limit on recoverable damages.
- Oklahoma's wrongful death statute had no limitation on the amount of recoverable damages.
Procedural Posture:
- The personal representatives of the deceased passengers (petitioners) sued the United States in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.
- The District Court dismissed the petitioners' complaints, finding that Oklahoma law, including its conflict-of-law rules, pointed to the application of Missouri's wrongful death statute.
- Petitioners appealed the dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's judgment.
- The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the circuits on how to interpret the FTCA's choice-of-law provision.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
In a multi-state tort action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, does the phrase 'law of the place where the act or omission occurred' require the application of the whole law, including the choice-of-law rules, of the state where the negligence occurred?
Opinions:
Majority - Chief Justice Warren
Yes. The Federal Tort Claims Act requires a federal court to apply the whole law, including the choice-of-law rules, of the state where the government's negligent act occurred. The plain language of the statute directs courts to the 'place where the act or omission occurred,' which in this case is Oklahoma. Furthermore, the FTCA provides that the United States shall be liable 'in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances.' To achieve this parity, a federal court must apply the entire body of law that would be applied to a private defendant in the state where the negligence occurred, including that state's conflict-of-laws rules. At the time, Oklahoma's conflict-of-laws rule dictated that the law of the place of the injury (lex loci delicti) governed the action, which points to Missouri's substantive law. Therefore, the Missouri wrongful death statute, with its damages cap, controls the case.
Analysis:
This decision resolved a significant circuit split regarding the choice-of-law provision in the Federal Tort Claims Act. By holding that 'law of the place' means the 'whole law,' the Court rejected the creation of a uniform federal choice-of-law rule for FTCA cases. Instead, it incorporated state choice-of-law doctrines, ensuring that the government's liability mirrors that of a private individual in the same jurisdiction. This approach allows federal law to adapt to evolving state conflict-of-law theories, such as the move away from the rigid lex loci delicti rule towards more flexible, interest-based analyses.
Unlock the full brief for Richards et al. v. United States et al.