Reeves v. Webb
297 Ga. 405, 774 S.E.2d 641 (2015)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A self-proving affidavit attached to a will creates a rebuttable presumption that the formalities of execution have been met, thereby satisfying the propounder's initial burden to make a prima facie case for probate without requiring the live testimony of the subscribing witnesses.
Facts:
- Joseph Thomas Schmidt, a disabled veteran with paranoid schizophrenia, had Dale L. Groenenboom as his court-appointed guardian and conservator from 1976 until his death.
- In 1997, Schmidt began living in a personal care home owned and operated by Charles and Jerry Reeves, who were paid for his care from funds controlled by Groenenboom.
- On July 20, 2010, Schmidt executed a will that included an attached, executed self-proving affidavit.
- The will named Groenenboom as executor and named Groenenboom and the Reeveses as the sole beneficiaries of his estate.
- The will expressly disinherited Schmidt's twin sister and sole heir at law, Judith Webb.
- Schmidt died on October 5, 2013.
Procedural Posture:
- Dale Groenenboom filed a petition in the probate court to probate Joseph Schmidt's will in solemn form.
- Judith Webb, Schmidt's sister, filed a caveat and objection to the petition, challenging the will's validity on grounds of undue influence, fraud, and lack of testamentary capacity.
- The probate court conducted a hearing and entered a final order dismissing the petition to probate the will.
- The probate court ruled that Groenenboom had failed to make out a prima facie case because he did not produce the will's subscribing witnesses for examination at the hearing.
- Groenenboom and the Reeveses filed a motion for new trial, or in the alternative, to set aside the judgment, which the probate court denied.
- Groenenboom and the Reeveses (appellants) appealed the probate court's dismissal and denial of their subsequent motion to the Supreme Court of Georgia.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a self-proving affidavit attached to a will eliminate the requirement for the propounder to produce the subscribing witnesses in person at a hearing to establish a prima facie case for probate in solemn form?
Opinions:
Majority - Hines, Presiding Justice
Yes, a self-proving affidavit eliminates the need for the propounder to produce the subscribing witnesses to establish a prima facie case. The probate court incorrectly relied on outdated precedent (Spivey v. Spivey) that required the in-person testimony of subscribing witnesses. Under the current Georgia statute, OCGA § 53-4-24, a will with a self-proving affidavit is presumed to have been executed in compliance with all legal formalities. This affidavit creates a presumption that satisfies the propounder's initial burden of proof regarding execution, shifting the burden to the caveator (the person challenging the will) to rebut this presumption. The propounder is not required to produce the witnesses in court to get past this initial stage.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies and modernizes the procedure for probating self-proved wills in Georgia, firmly rejecting an older, more rigid common law requirement. It reinforces the statutory power of a self-proving affidavit to streamline the probate process by creating a strong, albeit rebuttable, presumption of valid execution. This holding reduces the evidentiary burden on a will's proponent at the initial hearing, preventing challenges based on the mere absence of witnesses. It makes the probate process more efficient and predictable, aligning court practice with the legislature's intent to simplify will validation.
