Raleigh Avenue Beach Ass'n v. Atlantis Beach Club
879 A.2d 112 (2005)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The public trust doctrine extends to privately-owned upland dry sand areas when public access and use are reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of the ocean. The extent of this right is determined by balancing public need against private property interests using a multi-factor test, and the private owner may be required to permit public use for a reasonable fee approved by a state agency.
Facts:
- Atlantis Beach Club, Inc. (Atlantis) owns a 480-foot wide stretch of upland sand beach in Lower Township, Cape May County.
- In 1986, as a condition for building the adjacent La Vida condominiums, the state's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) required the developer to provide a permanent public access walkway over the property to the beach.
- Until 1996, the beach on the Atlantis property was open to and used by the public free of charge.
- In the summer of 1996, Atlantis began operating as a private beach club, restricting access to paying members and posting signs stating 'FREE PUBLIC ACCESS ENDS HERE.'
- For the 2003 summer season, Atlantis charged new members $700 for a seasonal membership or $10,000 for a permanent 'Access Easement.'
- The Atlantis beach is in the Diamond Beach neighborhood, which has no publicly-owned oceanfront beaches, and nearby beaches are either fee-based or closed for most of the summer to protect an endangered bird species.
- On June 22, 2002, Tony Labrosciano, a local resident, was issued a summons for trespassing when he attempted to walk across the Atlantis beach to return to his home.
Procedural Posture:
- Atlantis filed a complaint in a New Jersey trial court seeking to enjoin Tony Labrosciano and the public from trespassing on its property.
- Raleigh Avenue Beach Association filed a separate complaint against Atlantis, asserting a right of public access under the public trust doctrine; the two actions were consolidated.
- The trial court granted the public vertical access to the ocean and limited horizontal access via a three-foot-wide strip of dry sand, but held the rest of the private beach was not subject to the public trust doctrine.
- The State of New Jersey and the Raleigh Avenue Beach Association (appellants) appealed the decision to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey.
- The Appellate Division reversed the trial court, holding that the public trust doctrine required Atlantis to provide full public access to its entire dry sand beach for a reasonable fee approved by the DEP.
- Atlantis (petitioner) appealed the Appellate Division's decision, and the Supreme Court of New Jersey granted certification.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the public trust doctrine require a privately-owned upland sand beach, operated as a for-profit commercial enterprise, to be open to the general public for recreational use?
Opinions:
Majority - Chief Justice Poritz
Yes, the public trust doctrine requires the Atlantis property to be open to the general public for recreational use. The doctrine is not static and must be molded to meet the public's changing needs, which include not only access to the ocean but also reasonable use of the dry sand area for intermittent rest and recreation. Applying the four factors from Matthews v. Bay Head Improvement Ass'n, the court found: 1) the beach's location is essential for access; 2) there is a lack of publicly-owned beaches in the area; 3) there is significant public demand; and 4) Atlantis's commercial use of the property diminishes its private interest. This balance of factors weighs in favor of public use. The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has the authority under the Coastal Area Facility Review Act (CAFRA) to approve a reasonable fee schedule that covers Atlantis's costs but does not place an unreasonable economic burden on the public.
Dissenting - Justice Wallace, Jr.
No, the public trust doctrine does not require the entire privately-owned beach to be open for general public use, but only mandates reasonable access across it. While the public needs a way to get to the ocean, the existence of the adjacent Seapointe beach, which is open to the public for a fee, satisfies the public's need for recreational space. A proper balance between public rights and private property rights would be to grant the public vertical access to the ocean and a ten-foot-wide horizontal easement across the Atlantis property to reach the water and the neighboring Seapointe beach. Forcing a private, for-profit business to open its entire property to the public is an excessive intrusion when a less intrusive alternative exists.
Analysis:
This decision significantly expands the application of the public trust doctrine in New Jersey by extending it to a purely private, commercial beach, rather than just municipally-owned or 'quasi-public' lands as in prior precedent. The ruling solidifies the flexible, multi-factor test from Matthews as the standard for resolving conflicts between private beachfront owners and the public. By holding that commercial use of a beach weakens a landowner's claim to exclusivity, the case sets a precedent that could be used to challenge restrictions at other private beach clubs and open more of the state's coastline to public access and use.
Unlock the full brief for Raleigh Avenue Beach Ass'n v. Atlantis Beach Club