Queeman v. State
2017 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 573, 2017 WL 2562799, 520 S.W.3d 616 (2017)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A driver's failure to control speed and maintain a proper distance, resulting in a fatal accident, does not constitute criminally negligent homicide without additional evidence of more egregious conduct, such as excessive speeding, intoxication, or other seriously blameworthy actions that show a gross deviation from the ordinary standard of care.
Facts:
- Robert Alan Queeman was driving his van eastbound on a two-lane highway.
- An SUV, driven by Maria del Rosario Luna and occupied by two passengers, was traveling in front of Queeman.
- The SUV slowed down or stopped on the highway to make a left turn.
- Queeman's van rear-ended the SUV, causing it to roll over into the oncoming lane of traffic where it was struck by a truck.
- Olga Deleon, a passenger in the SUV, died as a result of the injuries sustained in the collision.
- A state trooper's investigation concluded that the SUV's brake lights were illuminated at the time of the collision.
- Queeman was not suspected of being intoxicated or otherwise impaired at the time of the accident.
- The trooper cited Queeman for failure to control speed but not for speeding over the posted limit.
Procedural Posture:
- Robert Alan Queeman was indicted for manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide in a Texas trial court.
- A jury acquitted Queeman of manslaughter but convicted him of criminally negligent homicide.
- The trial court sentenced Queeman to eighteen months' confinement in a state jail facility.
- Queeman (as appellant) appealed his conviction to the Texas Court of Appeals (an intermediate appellate court), arguing the evidence was legally insufficient.
- The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's judgment and rendered a judgment of acquittal.
- The State (as petitioner) sought and was granted discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (the state's highest court for criminal cases).
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a driver's failure to control speed and maintain a proper distance from a vehicle ahead, without more evidence of culpable risk-creating conduct, constitute a gross deviation from the standard of care sufficient to support a conviction for criminally negligent homicide?
Opinions:
Majority - Alcala, J.
No. The evidence of failing to maintain a safe driving speed and keep a proper distance is legally insufficient to establish that the driver's conduct was a gross deviation from the standard of care required for a criminally negligent homicide conviction. Criminal negligence requires a higher degree of carelessness than ordinary civil negligence; it necessitates proof of a failure to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk that is a 'gross deviation' from how an ordinary person would act. In this case, while Queeman was negligent, there was no evidence he was excessively speeding, intoxicated, distracted by a phone, or engaging in any other seriously blameworthy conduct. Unlike cases such as Montgomery (distracted driving and unsafe lane change) or Tello (knowingly using a faulty trailer), Queeman's conduct amounted to an 'unexplained failure' to see the vehicle ahead in time, which is ordinary negligence. Tragic consequences alone do not elevate ordinary negligence to criminal negligence.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the high evidentiary bar for proving criminally negligent homicide in cases arising from traffic accidents. The court clearly distinguishes between ordinary negligence, which gives rise to civil liability, and the 'gross deviation' from the standard of care required for criminal culpability. By requiring evidence beyond simple driving errors—such as excessive speed, intoxication, or other reckless acts—the court protects drivers from criminal prosecution for momentary inattention or misjudgment. This precedent will likely make it more difficult for prosecutors to secure convictions for criminally negligent homicide in fatal accidents unless they can present specific evidence of 'serious blameworthiness' beyond the collision itself.
