Pustejovsky v. Lodge
124 Tex. 504, 79 S.W.2d 1084, 1935 Tex. LEXIS 252 (1935)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Texas registration statutes, a subsequent purchaser of vendor's lien notes for value and without notice who records a written assignment explicitly granting lien priority will prevail over a prior assignee of other notes in the same series whose assignment was not recorded.
Facts:
- Vaclav Grossman sold a tract of land to F. E. Ermis, receiving a series of 16 vendor's lien notes in return, with the lien being reserved in a deed recorded on November 9, 1920.
- On December 28, 1924, Grossman sold and assigned notes 15 and 16 to Anton Miculka with a written endorsement guaranteeing payment.
- This assignment from Grossman to Miculka was never recorded in the public property records.
- Willie Miculka and Cecilia Miculka Pustejovsky later became the owners of notes 15 and 16 after Anton Miculka's death.
- On June 5, 1925, Grossman assigned notes 9 through 14 to the K. J. Z. T. Lodge.
- This assignment to the Lodge was written, explicitly stated that notes 9-14 were a 'first and superior lien' over notes 15 and 16, and was properly recorded.
- Before purchasing the notes, the Lodge hired an attorney to examine the public records, which showed Grossman as the owner of all remaining notes in the series (9-16).
- The Lodge would not have purchased the notes without the assurance of a first and superior lien.
Procedural Posture:
- K. J. Z. T. Lodge of Texas filed a foreclosure suit in state trial court.
- Willie Miculka and Cecilia Miculka Pustejovsky were named as defendants.
- The trial court, based on an agreed statement of facts, rendered judgment for the Lodge, finding its lien to be superior.
- The Miculka heirs, as appellants, appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals.
- The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of the Lodge, the appellee.
- The Miculka heirs, as plaintiffs in error, filed an application for a writ of error to the Supreme Court of Texas.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a subsequent assignee of vendor's lien notes, who records an assignment granting lien superiority, take priority over a prior, unrecorded assignee of other notes from the same series, when the public record showed the original lienholder still owned all the notes at the time of the second assignment?
Opinions:
Majority - Judge Taylor
Yes, a subsequent assignee who records an assignment granting superiority takes priority over a prior, unrecorded assignee. The registration statutes protect a subsequent purchaser for value without notice who relies on the public record. The court reasoned that the Lodge was entitled to rely on the record, which showed Grossman as the apparent owner of all the notes. The fact that Grossman was assigning only part of the series was not, in itself, sufficient to put the Lodge on inquiry notice of a prior unrecorded transfer. Citing Moran v. Wheeler, the court held that Miculka had the power to protect his interest by recording his assignment, and his failure to do so subordinated his lien to that of the Lodge, a subsequent bona fide purchaser who did record its assignment and its bargained-for priority. The protection of the registry acts is predicated on the assignor's apparent right to assign, not their actual right.
Analysis:
This case solidifies the importance of Texas's recording statutes in establishing priority among competing interests in real property liens. It clarifies that the burden is on the initial assignee of a vendor's lien note to record their interest to protect it against subsequent bona fide purchasers. The decision limits the doctrine of 'inquiry notice,' establishing that a purchaser is not required to investigate potential unrecorded transfers merely because the original lienholder is assigning only a portion of a note series. This precedent reinforces the principle that a clear public record can be relied upon, promoting certainty and predictability in real estate transactions.
