Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLC
813 F. Supp. 2d 489 (2011)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under New York's faithless servant doctrine, employees who breach their common law duty of loyalty by misappropriating confidential information and taking active steps to establish a competing business while still employed must forfeit all compensation earned during the period of their disloyalty.
Facts:
- Lauren Brenner founded Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc., a unique fitness facility modeled after military boot camps.
- Brenner hired former marines Ruben Belliard and Alexander Fell as drill instructors; Belliard eventually became the head instructor and a trusted employee.
- Brenner required her instructors, including Belliard, to sign an Employment Agreement containing non-compete, non-solicitation, and non-disclosure clauses as a condition of continued employment.
- While still employed at Pure Power, Belliard and Fell began planning to open a competing gym, Warrior Fitness, with the help of Jennifer Lee and Nancy Baynard, who were Pure Power clients and the instructors' respective girlfriends.
- Belliard entered Brenner's private office and used her personal computer to steal Pure Power's confidential business plan, operations manual, customer list, and a folder of employee Employment Agreements, which he later destroyed.
- Belliard shared the stolen documents with Fell, Lee, and Baynard. Lee used the stolen business plan and manuals to draft the business plan for Warrior Fitness.
- While still clients at Pure Power, Lee and Baynard solicited other Pure Power clients to join the forthcoming Warrior Fitness gym, and Lee made disparaging remarks about Brenner to other clients.
- Belliard and Fell took deliberate steps to leave Pure Power understaffed before their departure; Belliard successfully recommended another instructor be fired, and Fell intentionally provoked his own termination.
Procedural Posture:
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. and Lauren Brenner filed a lawsuit against Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLC and its principals in New York State Supreme Court.
- The state court denied Plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order to stop Warrior Fitness from opening, finding the non-compete agreement unenforceable, but ordered Defendants to return stolen materials.
- Defendants removed the action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
- In a pretrial ruling, the court granted Defendants' motion to preclude Plaintiffs from using emails obtained from Defendant Fell's personal email accounts, finding Plaintiffs had violated the Stored Communications Act (SCA).
- On a motion for partial summary judgment, the court found Plaintiffs were liable for $4,000 in statutory damages under the SCA.
- The parties consented to a bench trial before a United States Magistrate Judge on the remaining claims and counterclaims.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Do employees breach their common law duty of loyalty by stealing confidential documents, destroying company property, and soliciting clients to establish a competing business while still employed, and does such conduct warrant the forfeiture of their compensation under New York's faithless servant doctrine?
Opinions:
Majority - Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz
Yes. Employees breach their duty of loyalty when they engage in such duplicitous conduct, and under New York's faithless servant doctrine, this breach warrants the forfeiture of all compensation paid during the period of disloyalty, as well as punitive damages. The court found that Belliard and Fell's actions went far beyond mere preparation to compete. Their conduct, which included stealing and destroying confidential and proprietary documents, using those materials to build a competing business, and deliberately attempting to hamstring Pure Power by engineering the departure of key staff, constituted an egregious breach of the duty of utmost good faith and loyalty owed to their employer. The court determined that this disloyalty began in August 2007, when the planning and theft commenced, and calculated the forfeiture of their salaries from that date until their employment ended. The court also found the conduct so willful and wanton that it justified a significant award of punitive damages. In contrast, the court found the non-compete provision in the employment agreement unenforceable because its ten-year duration and worldwide geographic scope were commercially unreasonable and overbroad as a matter of law.
Analysis:
This case provides a stark illustration of New York's potent 'faithless servant doctrine,' which allows for a complete forfeiture of compensation as a remedy for employee disloyalty, even when the employer cannot prove direct financial losses like lost profits. The decision reinforces that the duty of loyalty prohibits employees from using their employer's time, resources, or confidential information to build a competing enterprise. It also serves as a strong cautionary example for employers in drafting restrictive covenants, as the court flatly rejected the non-compete clause for being facially overbroad in both time and geographic scope, rendering it completely unenforceable and refusing to 'blue-pencil' it.
Unlock the full brief for Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLC