Pulsifer v. Commissioner
1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 146, 64 T.C. 245 (1975)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the economic benefit doctrine, a taxpayer must recognize income in the year funds are irrevocably set aside for their sole benefit and are beyond the reach of the payor's creditors, even if the taxpayer has not yet physically received the funds.
Facts:
- Mr. Pulsifer acquired an Irish Hospital Sweepstakes ticket in his name and the names of his three minor children: Stephen, Susan, and Thomas Pulsifer.
- On March 21, 1969, the ticket was drawn, and their assigned horse, Saratoga Skiddy, placed second, winning a prize of $48,000.
- When Mr. Pulsifer applied for the winnings, he was informed that because three of the co-owners were minors, three-fourths of the prize money would not be released to him.
- Pursuant to Irish law, the children's shares, totaling over $12,000 each, were deposited with the Bank of Ireland into an account managed by the Accountant of the Courts of Justice for the children's benefit.
- The funds could be released either when the children reached the age of 21 or upon an application made to the Irish court by an appropriate party on their behalf.
- As the children's legal guardian, Mr. Pulsifer had an absolute right to apply for and obtain the funds from the court-administered account.
Procedural Posture:
- Stephen, Susan, and Thomas Pulsifer filed their 1969 Federal income tax returns using the cash receipts and disbursements method without including the sweepstakes winnings.
- The Respondent, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, determined a tax deficiency of $2,449.41 against each of the three petitioners for the 1969 tax year.
- The petitioners challenged the Commissioner's determination by filing petitions in the United States Tax Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the economic benefit doctrine require minor children to include sweepstakes winnings in their gross income for the year the winnings are irrevocably deposited into a court-administered bank account for their benefit, even if they have not yet taken physical possession of the money?
Opinions:
Majority - Hall, Judge
Yes. The economic benefit doctrine requires the minor children to include the winnings in their gross income for 1969. A taxpayer on a cash basis is currently taxable on the economic and financial benefit derived from an absolute right to income in a fund that has been irrevocably set aside for them and is beyond the payor's control. Here, the winnings were irrevocably set aside for the petitioners' sole benefit in the Irish court account. They had an absolute, nonforfeitable right to the funds, and the only prerequisite to receipt was an application by their legal guardian, which he had an absolute right to make. Citing E. T. Sproull, the court found that this arrangement conferred a clear economic benefit in 1969, regardless of whether the right to the funds was assignable.
Analysis:
This case provides a clear application of the economic benefit doctrine, distinguishing it from the constructive receipt doctrine. The decision solidifies the principle that income is realized when a taxpayer gains an absolute and nonforfeitable right to funds that have been secured for their benefit, even if procedural steps are required to gain physical possession. It establishes that control by a third party, such as a court, does not prevent taxation if the taxpayer's right to the funds is unconditional. This precedent is significant for any situation involving deferred compensation or prize winnings where funds are placed in trust or escrow, clarifying that the key to taxation is the taxpayer's absolute right to the benefit, not their immediate access to the cash.
