Priest v. ERNEST W. BALL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
62 So.3d 1013, 2010 WL 4679030, 2010 Ala. LEXIS 217 (2010)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When interpreting a deed, an unambiguous granting clause that clearly conveys a specific type of estate prevails over conflicting or ambiguous language in other parts of the deed, such as the warranty clause.
Facts:
- Thomas F. Loppnow and Ronna L. Loppnow, the grantors, executed a deed to convey real property to William Buxton and Judy Buxton.
- The law firm Ernest W. Ball & Associates, Inc. prepared the deed for the transaction.
- The granting clause of the deed conveyed the property to the Buxtons 'for and during their life and upon their death, then to their heirs in fee simple.'
- The deed also contained a warranty clause, which warranted and defended the property 'unto the said Grantees, their heirs, executors and assigns forever.'
Procedural Posture:
- William and Judy Buxton filed a complaint for a declaratory judgment in an Alabama trial court against the law firm Ernest W. Ball & Associates, Inc.
- The Buxtons filed a motion for summary judgment, asking the court to declare that the deed conveyed a fee simple interest.
- The trial court added Blake Horton, Devon Horton, and a guardian ad litem, Christopher M. Priest, as defendants to represent the interests of the Buxtons' potential heirs.
- The trial court granted the Buxtons' motion for summary judgment, holding that the deed's language was ambiguous and thus conveyed a fee simple estate under Alabama's statutory presumption.
- Christopher Priest, as guardian ad litem and appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a deed's granting clause, which explicitly conveys property to grantees 'for and during their life and upon their death, then to their heirs in fee simple,' create a life estate even if a subsequent warranty clause contains language that could be interpreted as conveying a fee simple estate?
Opinions:
Majority - Bolin, Justice
Yes, the deed creates a life estate. The primary rule in construing a deed is to ascertain the grantor's intent from the plain language within the four corners of the instrument. The granting clause is the 'very essence' of the deed and determines the interest conveyed. Here, the language in the granting clause—'for and during their life and upon their death'—is the 'telltale language' that clearly and unambiguously creates a life estate. Because the grantor's intent to convey a lesser estate than fee simple is clearly expressed, the statutory presumption in favor of a fee simple estate (§ 35-4-2, Ala. Code 1975) does not apply. Any ambiguity created by general language in the warranty clause (referencing 'heirs, executors, and assigns') does not override the specific, clear grant in the granting clause, as the granting clause prevails in cases of repugnancy.
Analysis:
This decision reaffirms the hierarchical rule of construction for deeds in Alabama, establishing the supremacy of the granting clause over other provisions. It clarifies that the statutory presumption favoring fee simple estates is a default rule that applies only when a grantor's intent is ambiguous, not when a lesser estate is clearly specified. The ruling provides stability in property law by ensuring that specific, unambiguous language creating a life estate will be enforced, even against potentially contradictory boilerplate language in other clauses. This precedent guides attorneys and courts to prioritize the most direct statement of conveyance when interpreting potentially conflicting deed provisions.
