Lexplug logoLexplug

Powers v. Morrison

Texas Supreme Court
28 L.R.A. 521, 30 S.W. 851, 88 Tex. 133 (1895)
ELI5:

Sections

Rule of Law:

Under Texas statutes of descent and distribution, an heir taking per stirpes (by representation) inherits title directly from the intestate decedent, and their share is not subject to offset by debts owed to the estate by their predeceased intermediate ancestor.


Facts:

  • N. P. Coleman died intestate (without a will), survived by a widow and five children.
  • One of Coleman's sons had died prior to Coleman's death.
  • This deceased son left behind a minor son (Coleman's grandchild), who is the plaintiff in error.
  • At the time of his death, the deceased son owed a debt to his father (N. P. Coleman).
  • The amount of this debt exceeded the value of the share the son would have inherited had he survived.
  • The deceased son's estate was insolvent and unable to pay its debts.
  • Morrison, the administrator of N. P. Coleman's estate, sought to offset the father's debt against the grandchild's share.

Procedural Posture:

  • The case originated in the County Court of Henderson County as a proceeding for the partition and distribution of the estate.
  • The case was appealed to the District Court.
  • The District Court ruled that the grandchild's share was subject to offset by the father's debt and that the grandchild should take nothing.
  • The grandchild appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals.
  • The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District Court.
  • The grandchild (plaintiff in error) appealed to the Supreme Court of Texas.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Is a grandchild, who inherits a share of a grandfather's estate by representation in place of a deceased father, chargeable with the debts the father owed to the grandfather's estate?


Opinions:

Majority - Chief Justice Gaines

No, a grandchild inheriting by representation is not liable for the debts of their predeceased parent to the estate. The Court reasoned that the right of succession is created by statute. While the statute dictates that descendants take 'per stirpes' (by representation) to determine the amount of the share, it does not imply that the descendant takes the property through the deceased parent. Instead, the title is cast directly from the intestate grandfather to the grandchild. Because the father died before the grandfather, the father never had title to the property; therefore, the grandchild inherits the property directly from the grandfather, free of the father's liabilities. The Court rejected the 'Pennsylvania rule' (which views the heir as representing the ancestor with all burdens) and adopted the view of Massachusetts and Maryland, holding that the grandchild takes by substitution and paramount to the parent, not through them.



Analysis:

This decision clarifies the legal nature of inheritance by representation (per stirpes) in Texas. It distinguishes between using a deceased ancestor to calculate the proportion of an estate an heir receives versus the path of title transfer. By ruling that title flows directly from the decedent to the heir, the court protects grandchildren from being disinherited due to the financial failures of their parents. This establishes a strict statutory construction approach to descent and distribution, ensuring that heirs are not penalized for debts they did not incur and for property they did not receive from the debtor parent.

G

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Powers v. Morrison (1895)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"