Porter v. Porter
472 So. 2d 630 (1985)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A divorce decree that grants one party temporary, exclusive occupancy of property held in a joint tenancy with right of survivorship does not, by itself, sever the joint tenancy or destroy the right of survivorship unless the decree clearly expresses the intent to do so.
Facts:
- In 1948, Mary Jane Porter and Denis M. Porter were married.
- In 1963, the couple purchased a house under a deed explicitly stating they held the property 'as joint tenants, with right of survivorship.'
- The couple divorced in 1976.
- The divorce decree granted Mary Jane Porter the right to 'exclusive occupancy' of the house 'until a change in circumstances warrants a modification,' and referred to the property as 'jointly owned.'
- The decree required Denis Porter to continue paying the mortgage and other property expenses.
- Sometime after the divorce, Denis Porter married Martha Porter.
- Denis Porter died in 1983, without any modification having been made to the divorce decree regarding the property.
- Neither Mary Jane Porter nor Denis Porter had attempted to convey their interest in the property prior to Denis's death.
Procedural Posture:
- Martha Porter, as executrix of Denis Porter's estate, filed a complaint in the trial court for the sale of the property for division.
- Both parties moved for summary judgment.
- The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Martha Porter, ruling that the divorce had converted the joint tenancy into a tenancy in common and that each party owned a one-half undivided interest.
- Mary Jane Porter's motion for reconsideration was denied by the trial court.
- Mary Jane Porter (appellant) appealed the trial court's judgment to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a divorce decree that grants one former spouse temporary and exclusive occupancy of a marital home, held under a deed as a joint tenancy with right of survivorship, automatically sever that tenancy and destroy the right of survivorship?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Almon
No. A divorce decree granting one party temporary exclusive occupancy of jointly owned property does not sever a joint tenancy with right of survivorship. To sever a joint tenancy, one of the four common law unities (time, title, interest, or possession) must be destroyed. The appellee argued that granting 'exclusive occupancy' to Mary Jane Porter destroyed the unity of possession. However, the court found this occupancy was temporary, not permanent, as evidenced by the divorce court's retention of jurisdiction to modify the decree. A mere temporary division of property, without an express intent to partition, is insufficient to destroy the unity of possession and sever the tenancy. The decree's references to 'jointly owned' property were ambiguous and did not explicitly terminate the survivorship right. Because a divorce does not automatically sever a joint tenancy and property cannot be conveyed by implication, the original survivorship provision remained intact.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies that severance of a joint tenancy with right of survivorship requires an explicit, affirmative act or judicial decree, not merely an implication drawn from divorce-related orders like temporary occupancy. It establishes a high bar for inferring severance, thereby protecting the stability of survivorship interests unless the divorce decree specifically and unambiguously terminates them. The ruling serves as a crucial reminder for divorce practitioners to explicitly address the disposition of jointly held property with survivorship rights in settlement agreements and decrees to avoid unintended consequences upon the death of a former spouse.
Unlock the full brief for Porter v. Porter