Popp v. Bond
1946 Fla. LEXIS 516, 158 Fla. 185, 28 So. 2d 259 (1946)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Where a remainder is devised to a class, a conveyance by the life tenant and all living members of the class who are parties to the action will bind all future members of the class, thereby conveying a fee simple title and extinguishing the contingent remainder of unborn class members.
Facts:
- John B. Franke's will devised a life estate in his property to his daughter, Lucile Margarite Louise Franke (now Mrs. H. L. Popp).
- The will stated that upon Lucile's death, the remainder would go one-half to her child or children and one-half to the Theological Lutheran Church.
- If Lucile died without children, the entire remainder would go to the Church.
- Lucile is alive and has two minor children, H. Leslie Popp, Jr., and John F. Popp.
- Lucile acquired the interest of the Theological Lutheran Church.
- Lucile, her husband, and her husband as legal guardian for their two living minor children, contracted to sell the property to the appellee.
- The appellee refused to complete the purchase, asserting that the title was not merchantable due to the possibility that Lucile might have more children in the future whose interests would not be extinguished by the sale.
Procedural Posture:
- The sellers (appellants, the Popps) filed a bill of complaint in a Florida trial court (a court of equity) to compel specific performance against the buyer (appellee).
- The case was heard by the Chancellor on an agreed statement of facts.
- The Chancellor found the title to be not merchantable and entered a final decree in favor of the buyer.
- The sellers (appellants) appealed the final decree to the Florida Supreme Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Can a life tenant, joined by all living remaindermen of a class, convey a merchantable fee simple title that is free and clear of the potential claims of any after-born children who would also be members of that class?
Opinions:
Majority - Terrell, J.
Yes. A life tenant and the living remaindermen of a class can convey a fee simple title free and clear of claims from future-born children of the same class. The court reasoned that this outcome is dictated by the common law rule, as established in Florida by Blocker v. Blocker, that contingent remainders can be defeated by determining the particular estate upon which they depend before the contingency occurs. In this case, the conveyance by the life tenant (Lucile) and the living remaindermen (her two children) merges their interests. This merger effectively destroys the particular estate and extinguishes the contingent remainder held for any potential, unborn children. The court explicitly rejected the contrary Illinois rule, affirming that under Florida's common law, the living members of the class virtually represent the interests of any after-born members, and a decree or conveyance involving the living members binds the entire class.
Analysis:
This decision reaffirms Florida's adherence to the common law doctrine of the destructibility of contingent remainders, particularly in the context of class gifts. It prioritizes the alienability of property, allowing for the transfer of a clear title even when remote, future interests of unborn heirs exist. By applying the doctrine of virtual representation, the court provides certainty in real estate transactions involving life estates, ensuring that living members of a class can act on behalf of the entire class, including those not yet in being. This precedent solidifies a clear rule for title examiners and property lawyers in Florida, distinguishing the state's jurisprudence from jurisdictions that have moved to protect the interests of unborn remaindermen more robustly.
