Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc.
261 F.3d 1188 (2001)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The distribution of free software over the Internet can constitute 'use in commerce' under the Lanham Act sufficient to establish trademark rights, even without any sales, as long as the use is sufficiently public to create an association between the mark and the product in the minds of the relevant public.
Facts:
- In late 1994, Byron Darrah developed a UNIX-based e-mail notification program which he named 'Coolmail'.
- On December 31, 1994, Darrah distributed the 'Coolmail' software for free over the Internet by posting it on a public UNIX user site called 'Sunsite' under a GNU General Public License.
- The name 'Coolmail' appeared on the announcement sent to users and on the software's user manual.
- In early 1995, a German company, S.u.S.E. GmbH, obtained Darrah's permission to include the 'Coolmail' software in a CD-ROM compilation of programs that it sold commercially in the United States and abroad.
- On April 16, 1998, Michael Carson's company, Techsplosion, Inc., began offering a commercial e-mail service on the Internet under the mark 'CoolMail'.
- On April 24, 1998, Planetary Motion, Inc. filed intent-to-use applications to register the mark 'Coolmail' for its own planned e-mail service.
- On June 8, 1998, Planetary Motion launched its commercial 'Coolmail' e-mail service.
- In July 1999, after initiating its lawsuit, Planetary Motion purchased from Darrah all rights, title, and interest to the 'Coolmail' software, including any associated trademark rights.
Procedural Posture:
- Planetary Motion, Inc. sued Techsplosion, Inc. and Michael Gay in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida for trademark infringement and unfair competition.
- Techsplosion filed an answer and counterclaims, alleging its own rights to the 'Coolmail' mark.
- Planetary Motion filed an amended complaint after acquiring the rights to the original 'Coolmail' software from Byron Darrah.
- Both parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
- The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Planetary Motion, finding it had priority of use and that there was a likelihood of confusion.
- The district court entered a final judgment granting a permanent injunction and awarding profits, attorney fees, and costs to Planetary Motion.
- Techsplosion, as appellant, appealed the district court's judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, with Planetary Motion as appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the free, non-commercial distribution of software over the Internet constitute 'use in commerce' under the Lanham Act sufficient to establish trademark ownership rights?
Opinions:
Majority - Restani, Judge
Yes. The free, non-commercial distribution of software over the Internet can constitute 'use in commerce' under the Lanham Act sufficient to establish trademark ownership rights. The Lanham Act defines 'use in commerce' as the bona fide use of a mark when goods are 'sold or transported in commerce.' Because the statute is written in the disjunctive, a 'transport' without a 'sale' can be sufficient. To establish ownership through such use, a party must show adoption of the mark and use that is sufficiently public to identify the goods in the minds of the public as those of the adopter. Here, Darrah's distribution of 'Coolmail' meets this standard under a 'totality of the circumstances' analysis because: the distribution was widespread via the Internet, not secret or de minimis; end-users associated the mark with the software; the mark identified Darrah as the source; other potential users had notice of the mark; and the software was eventually incorporated into a commercial product sold by a third party. The fact that the software was distributed under a GNU license and without a profit motive does not defeat the creation of trademark rights, as these are customary practices within the software industry.
Analysis:
This case is significant for clarifying that traditional sales are not a prerequisite for establishing trademark rights for digital goods in the internet era. The court's holding provides a basis for creators of freeware and open-source software to acquire and enforce trademark rights based on public distribution alone. This decision expands trademark protection to non-commercial creators who build public recognition through widespread free dissemination, establishing that 'transport in commerce' has substantial meaning independent of sales, particularly within industries where free distribution is a standard practice.
Unlock the full brief for Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc.