Planetary Motion v. TECHPLOSION
Aug. 16, 2001 (2001)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Widespread distribution of a product over the Internet without charge, but for a commercial purpose, can constitute 'use in commerce' under the Lanham Act sufficient to establish trademark rights, even without direct sales.
Facts:
- In late 1994, Byron Darrah developed a UNIX-based e-mail notification program which he named 'Coolmail'.
- On December 31, 1994, Darrah distributed the 'Coolmail' software for free over the Internet by posting it on a public user site, accompanied by a user manual also bearing the name.
- In 1995, Darrah consented to S.u.S.E. GmbH, a German company, including his 'Coolmail' software in a CD-ROM compilation of programs that was sold in stores in the United States and online.
- On April 16, 1998, Michael Carson and his company Techsplosion began offering a free, ad-supported e-mail service to the public under the mark 'CoolMail'.
- On April 24, 1998, Planetary Motion filed intent-to-use applications to register the mark 'Coolmail' for its own telephone-based e-mail service.
- Planetary Motion launched its 'Coolmail' service on June 8, 1998.
- In July 1999, after litigation had commenced, Planetary Motion purchased from Darrah all rights, title, and interest to the original 'Coolmail' software, including any associated trademarks.
Procedural Posture:
- Planetary Motion, Inc. sued Techsplosion, Inc. and Michael Carson in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida for trademark infringement.
- Techsplosion filed counterclaims against Planetary Motion for trademark infringement.
- Planetary Motion filed an Amended Complaint after purchasing the rights to 'Coolmail' software from its original developer, Byron Darrah.
- On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court granted Planetary Motion’s motion and denied Techsplosion’s motion.
- The district court entered a final judgment, granting Planetary Motion a permanent injunction and an award of profits, damages, attorney fees, and costs.
- Techsplosion and Carson, as Appellants, filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the free distribution of software over the Internet, without any sales, constitute 'use in commerce' under the Lanham Act sufficient to establish trademark ownership rights?
Opinions:
Majority - Restani, J.
Yes, the free distribution of software over the Internet can constitute 'use in commerce' sufficient to establish trademark ownership. The Lanham Act's 'use in commerce' requirement involves both a jurisdictional element and an ownership element. While jurisdiction is easily met by internet distribution that affects interstate commerce, establishing ownership requires more than token use. The court applied a 'totality of circumstances' analysis and found that sales are not dispositive. Darrah's use was sufficient because: (1) the distribution was widespread and public via the internet, not secret or de minimis; (2) the mark was used to identify the source of the software in announcements and manuals; (3) users and other companies associated the 'Coolmail' name with Darrah's software; and (4) distributing software for free under a GNU license is a customary practice in the software industry and does not constitute abandonment of the mark. This public exposure created an association in the public's mind sufficient to establish ownership rights, which were then validly transferred to Planetary Motion.
Analysis:
This case is significant for adapting traditional trademark principles to the digital age, particularly regarding software and internet-based services. The court's holding clarifies that 'use in commerce' under the Lanham Act is not strictly limited to transactions involving a sale. By recognizing that widespread, public, non-monetary distribution can create the necessary public association to establish trademark rights, the decision provides crucial protection for open-source software developers and others who distribute products for free online. This precedent ensures that priority of use can be established through non-traditional business models common on the Internet, focusing on public identification rather than direct sales revenue.
Unlock the full brief for Planetary Motion v. TECHPLOSION