Pernell v. Southall Realty
1974 U.S. LEXIS 130, 40 L. Ed. 2d 198, 416 U.S. 363 (1974)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial in civil actions for the recovery of possession of real property because such actions are considered 'Suits at common law.' This right extends to modern statutory summary proceedings, as they are analogous to common-law actions like ejectment which were historically tried by a jury.
Facts:
- In May 1971, Dave Pernell entered into a lease agreement with Southall Realty to rent a house in the District of Columbia.
- Southall Realty alleged that Pernell subsequently failed to pay rent.
- Pernell denied that rent was due, asserting that Southall Realty had breached an agreement to waive rent in exchange for Pernell making certain improvements to the property.
- Pernell also contended that Southall Realty had violated District of Columbia housing regulations by maintaining the premises in an unsafe, unhealthy, and unsanitary condition.
- Pernell made repairs to the property to bring it into partial compliance with housing regulations.
Procedural Posture:
- Southall Realty filed a complaint against Dave Pernell in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia (a trial court) to recover possession of real property.
- In his answer, Pernell requested a trial by jury.
- The trial judge struck Pernell's jury demand, conducted a bench trial, and entered judgment in favor of Southall Realty.
- Pernell, as appellant, appealed to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (an intermediate appellate court).
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the Seventh Amendment does not guarantee a jury trial in summary landlord-tenant actions for repossession.
- The Supreme Court of the United States granted Pernell's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the Seventh Amendment guarantee a right to a jury trial in a summary action to recover possession of real property brought in a District of Columbia court?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Justice Marshall
Yes, the Seventh Amendment guarantees a right to a jury trial in a summary action to recover possession of real property. The test for the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial is not whether the specific statutory cause of action existed in 1791, but whether the action involves rights and remedies of the sort traditionally enforced in an action at law. Actions to recover possession of land were quintessentially actions at law at common law, most notably the action of ejectment, which always included the right to a jury trial. The modern D.C. statutory proceeding for repossession serves the same essential function as the common-law action of ejectment, and therefore the constitutional right to a jury trial is preserved for parties in such proceedings.
Concurring - The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Douglas
Concurred in the result without a written opinion.
Analysis:
This case solidifies the application of the historical test for the Seventh Amendment, emphasizing that the substance of the rights and remedies, not the procedural form of a modern statute, determines the right to a jury trial. By extending this right to summary eviction proceedings, the Court provided significant procedural protection for tenants, ensuring that factual disputes in eviction cases can be decided by a jury rather than solely by a judge. The decision affirms that efficiency in judicial proceedings cannot override fundamental constitutional rights and has a lasting impact on landlord-tenant law, particularly in federal jurisdictions and in states with similar constitutional provisions.
