People v. Kolzow
301 Ill. App. 3d, 703 N.E.2d 424 (1998)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A person acts with the recklessness required for an involuntary manslaughter conviction when they consciously disregard a substantial and unjustifiable risk of death or great bodily harm, and such disregard is a gross deviation from the standard of care a reasonable person would exercise.
Facts:
- During the night of August 11, 1996, Donna Kolzow was out with her three-month-old son, Jeffrey.
- Kolzow arrived at her residence around 5:00 a.m. but waited in a nearby lot until her stepmother's car was gone at 6:30 a.m.
- At 6:30 a.m., Kolzow parked her car, turned off the engine, closed the driver's window, locked the doors, and went inside the house, leaving Jeffrey in his car seat inside the vehicle.
- Kolzow stated she went inside, set an alarm for 9:30 a.m., lay on the couch, and fell asleep.
- At 10:30 a.m., Kolzow awoke, realized the baby was still in the car, and found him unresponsive with a purple face.
- An autopsy determined that the infant died of heat stroke.
- A neighbor, George Gourley, testified that he had witnessed Kolzow leave the child unattended in her car on at least half a dozen prior occasions.
Procedural Posture:
- Donna Kolzow was charged with involuntary manslaughter for the death of her son, Jeffrey.
- Following a bench trial in the Cook County trial court, Kolzow was convicted of involuntary manslaughter.
- The trial court sentenced Kolzow to three years’ probation, with conditions including six months in custody.
- Kolzow, as the appellant, appealed her conviction and sentence to the Illinois Appellate Court, arguing the evidence was insufficient to prove recklessness.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a mother's act of leaving her three-month-old infant unattended in a parked car for four hours on a summer day, resulting in the infant's death from heat stroke, constitute a conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk sufficient to support a conviction for involuntary manslaughter?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice O’Mara Frossard
Yes, the mother's actions constitute a conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk sufficient for an involuntary manslaughter conviction. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, supports the conclusion that the defendant acted recklessly. A reasonable person would be aware of the clear and obvious risk of leaving a three-month-old infant unattended in a parked car for four hours on a summer day. The court found the defendant's claim that she simply 'forgot' the child was not credible, pointing to evidence that suggested she intended to leave the child in the car to get uninterrupted sleep. These actions included waiting for her stepmother to leave, setting an alarm, and locking the car. This conscious disregard of a known risk was a gross deviation from the standard of care and satisfied the mental state of recklessness required for involuntary manslaughter.
Analysis:
This case clarifies that the mental state of recklessness for involuntary manslaughter can be inferred from a defendant's actions, even when they claim a lack of subjective awareness of the risk, such as 'forgetting'. It establishes that the failure to appreciate the obvious and substantial danger of leaving an infant in a hot car is itself a gross deviation from the objective standard of care a reasonable person would exercise. The decision reinforces that parental negligence can rise to the level of criminal recklessness, and a defendant's self-serving claims about their state of mind can be overcome by circumstantial evidence suggesting a conscious disregard for a child's safety.
Unlock the full brief for People v. Kolzow