People v. James
62 Cal.App.4th 244, 74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 7 (1998)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The felony of manufacturing methamphetamine is inherently dangerous to human life for purposes of the second-degree felony-murder rule because the process necessarily involves volatile, flammable, and toxic chemicals that create a substantial risk of death.
Facts:
- Kathey Lynn James lived in a mobile home with her four children and several other adults, supporting the household by manufacturing methamphetamine.
- James regularly produced methamphetamine using a process that involved flammable and volatile chemicals, including Coleman fuel, acetone, lye, red phosphorus, and various acids.
- She stored large quantities of these hazardous chemicals in and around the mobile home, including under her bed and in the kitchen.
- Witnesses had observed James manufacturing the drug in the kitchen, sometimes while her young children were nearby.
- On December 26, 1995, a fire ignited in the kitchen of the mobile home while James was allegedly engaged in the drug manufacturing process.
- The resulting conflagration destroyed the mobile home and killed three of James's children, ages one, two, and three.
Procedural Posture:
- Kathey Lynn James was charged in a California trial court with three counts of second-degree murder, manufacturing methamphetamine, and conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine.
- A jury found James guilty on all counts, basing the murder verdicts on both implied malice and second-degree felony murder theories.
- The trial court sentenced James to 45 years to life in prison.
- James (as appellant) appealed the judgment to the California Court of Appeal, arguing that manufacturing methamphetamine is not an inherently dangerous felony and that the evidence of implied malice was insufficient.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is the felony of manufacturing methamphetamine an inherently dangerous felony for the purpose of the second-degree felony-murder rule?
Opinions:
Majority - Richli, J.
Yes, manufacturing methamphetamine is an inherently dangerous felony for purposes of the second-degree felony-murder rule. The court determines whether a felony is inherently dangerous by looking at the elements of the crime in the abstract, not the specific facts of the case. Manufacturing methamphetamine requires the use of hazardous materials like acetone and Coleman fuel, which are highly volatile and flammable, and other toxic substances like red phosphorus and acids. The process often requires a heat source near these flammable materials, creating an imminent and substantial danger to human life. Citing cases from other legal contexts, such as those involving child endangerment and exigent circumstances for warrantless searches, the court found a consistent judicial recognition of the extreme dangers posed by meth labs. The argument that a skilled person can manufacture it safely is unpersuasive, as the practice by its very nature cannot be committed without creating a substantial risk that someone will be killed.
Analysis:
This case establishes a significant precedent in California by officially classifying the manufacturing of methamphetamine as an inherently dangerous felony. This classification allows prosecutors to secure a second-degree murder conviction without proving malice aforethought if a death results from the manufacturing process. The decision clarifies that courts can consider expert testimony and scientific literature to understand the abstract dangers of a technical or scientific crime, while still adhering to the rule of not considering the defendant's specific conduct. This ruling strengthens the legal tools available to combat the deadly consequences of illegal drug production and is likely to influence how similar cases involving other inherently dangerous illegal activities are treated.
Unlock the full brief for People v. James