People v. Drumheller
1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 1686, 304 N.E.2d 455, 15 Ill. App. 3d 418 (1973)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The mental state for murder can be inferred from a voluntary act whose natural tendency is to cause death or great bodily harm, and a fatal blow with a bare fist can constitute murder when there is a significant disparity in size and strength between the actor and the victim.
Facts:
- Mary Breitweiser and her 14-month-old son, David, moved into the defendant's home.
- The defendant was responsible for caring for David in the evenings and began to physically discipline the child.
- On September 9, 1970, the defendant spanked David hard enough to leave black and blue marks on his buttocks.
- On September 16 and September 23, the defendant again spanked the infant, causing further bruising and injuries.
- On September 25, 1970, the defendant, frustrated with David, struck the child in the stomach with a closed fist, lifting him off the floor.
- The child experienced a convulsion shortly after being struck and was taken to the hospital by the defendant.
- David died on September 29, 1970.
- Medical evidence established the cause of death as acute peritonitis resulting from a ruptured stomach caused by a blunt external blow.
Procedural Posture:
- The defendant was charged with murder.
- Following a trial in the court of first instance, a jury found the defendant guilty of murder.
- The trial court sentenced the defendant to a term of 70 to 125 years in prison.
- The defendant appealed his conviction and sentence to the appellate court, arguing the evidence was insufficient for murder, his trial counsel was incompetent, the jury was improperly instructed, and the sentence was excessive.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a fatal blow delivered with a bare fist by an adult to a 14-month-old child, following a pattern of physical discipline, establish the requisite mental state for murder, which is the intent to kill or knowledge that the act creates a strong probability of death or great bodily harm?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Justice Thomas J. Moran
Yes, a fatal blow with a bare fist to a 14-month-old child is sufficient to establish the mental state for murder. It is not necessary to directly prove an intent to kill; intent can be inferred from a voluntary and willful act, the natural tendency of which is to destroy another's life. The defendant’s prior acts of inflicting injury on the child refute his claim that the fatal blow was merely accidental or reckless. The jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant knew or should have known his conduct created a strong probability of death or great bodily harm. While a fatal blow from a bare fist may not always be murder, the extreme disparity in size and strength between the adult defendant and the 14-month-old victim warrants a murder conviction in this instance.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces that the mental state for murder can be proven circumstantially, based on the nature of the act and the vulnerability of the victim. It establishes that a defendant cannot escape a murder conviction by claiming they only used a 'bare fist' when the victim is an infant, as the court will consider the disparity in size and strength as a key factor. The case provides a clear precedent for prosecutors in child abuse cases, allowing them to use a pattern of prior abuse to negate defenses of accident or recklessness and to establish the necessary mens rea for murder.
