People v. Brackett
117 Ill. 2d 170, 510 N.E.2d 877 (1987)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A defendant's criminal act that sets in motion a chain of events contributing to a victim's death is a legally sufficient cause of death for a murder conviction, even if an intervening event is the immediate cause of death.
Facts:
- On October 20, 1981, Randy Brackett, age 21, entered the home of Elizabeth Winslow, an 85-year-old widow, for whom he had previously done yard work.
- Brackett raped and severely beat Mrs. Winslow, causing injuries that included a broken arm, a broken rib, and numerous bruises.
- Following the attack, Mrs. Winslow was hospitalized, became depressed and weak, and had difficulty eating.
- After being transferred to a nursing home, her facial injuries from the beating made it too painful to insert a nasal gastric feeding tube.
- Approximately five weeks after the attack, on November 24, 1981, Mrs. Winslow died from asphyxiation after aspirating food into her trachea while being fed.
- Medical testimony established that her broken rib inhibited deep breathing, diminishing her ability to cough and expel the lodged food.
- Her weakened and debilitated state, a direct result of the trauma from the attack, also contributed to her inability to swallow properly and clear her airway.
Procedural Posture:
- Randy Brackett was charged in the circuit court of Madison County with rape, deviate sexual assault, and aggravated battery.
- After the victim, Mrs. Winslow, died, Brackett was additionally charged with four counts of murder.
- The trial court granted Brackett's motion to sever the charges, resulting in separate bench trials.
- In the first trial, the court convicted Brackett of rape and aggravated battery.
- In the second trial, the court convicted Brackett of murder.
- Brackett's separate appeals were consolidated in the Illinois appellate court, which acted as the intermediate appellate court.
- The appellate court affirmed the murder conviction and vacated the rape and aggravated battery convictions.
- The Illinois Supreme Court, the state's highest court, granted Brackett leave to appeal the murder conviction.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a defendant's criminal act constitute a legally sufficient cause of a victim's death for a murder conviction when the act initiates a chain of events that contributes to the death, even though the immediate cause of death is an intervening event that occurred weeks later?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Ryan
Yes. A defendant's criminal act is a legally sufficient cause of death for a murder conviction if it sets in motion a chain of events that contributes to the victim's death. The State must prove that death was caused by a criminal agency, but the defendant's acts need not be the sole and immediate cause. The court found that the trier of fact reasonably concluded that Brackett's acts were a contributing cause of Mrs. Winslow's death. The beating directly led to her weakened state, her broken rib impaired her ability to clear her airway, and her facial injuries prevented a safer feeding method. This case falls under the principle that a defendant takes his victim as he finds him, meaning Brackett is responsible for the consequences of his attack on a frail, elderly person. Because the death resulted from the commission of a forcible felony, the defendant did not need to foresee the precise manner of death to be found guilty of felony murder.
Analysis:
This case reinforces the criminal law doctrine that a defendant's actions need only be a 'contributing cause' of death, not the sole or immediate cause, to establish causation for murder. It affirms the 'take your victim as you find them' rule, extending it to the victim’s advanced age and overall frailty, making it difficult for defendants to escape liability by arguing the victim's pre-existing condition was the 'real' cause of death. The decision clarifies that for felony murder, the foreseeability requirement applies to the general risk of death from the underlying felony, not the specific, and perhaps unusual, mechanism by which death occurs. This precedent strengthens the prosecution's ability to secure murder convictions where a significant time lag or an intervening medical event separates the criminal act from the victim's death.
Unlock the full brief for People v. Brackett