Pederson v. McGuire
333 N.W.2d 823 (1983)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A standard 'time is of the essence' clause in a real estate contract will not be strictly enforced where other terms of the agreement, such as the deadlines for full payment and delivery of the deed, are indefinite. In such cases, the seller is afforded a reasonable time to cure any defects in the title before the buyer may rescind the contract.
Facts:
- On August 26, 1946, the City of Sioux Falls granted a railroad an irrevocable easement for a right-of-way on Weber Avenue, which provided the only ingress and egress to a property known as Cargill Tract #1.
- In 1978, W. Gordon and Joyce Pederson, owners of Cargill Tract #1, negotiated a license with the railroad for a private roadway crossing over the easement; the license was revocable by the railroad on 30 days' notice and was publicly recorded.
- On February 23, 1981, Sioux Sound Co. executed an agreement to purchase Cargill Tract #1 from the Pedersons, with a closing date of May 1, 1981. The contract included a 'TIME is the essence' clause but made delivery of the deed contingent on full payment, which depended on a mortgage with no specified disbursement date.
- Mr. McGuire, president of Sioux Sound Co., had previously visited the property and observed a portion of the railroad track in the parking area.
- In April 1981, Sioux Sound Co.'s attorney discovered the 1946 easement and the 1978 revocable license while reviewing the title insurance policy.
- On May 7, 1981, Sioux Sound Co. notified the Pedersons' realtor that it was cancelling the purchase agreement because of the revocable license.
- Following the cancellation, the Pedersons made several proposals to cure the title defect, culminating in an agreement with the railroad to permanently cancel its interest in the easement.
Procedural Posture:
- W. Gordon and Joyce Pederson (appellees) sued Robert P. McGuire in state trial court for specific performance of the real estate purchase agreement.
- The trial court granted summary judgment for Mr. McGuire because he was not a party to the agreement.
- The Pedersons filed an amended complaint against Sioux Sound Co. (appellant).
- Sioux Sound Co. answered and filed a counterclaim alleging title defects and fraud.
- Following a bench trial, the trial court initially issued a memorandum decision denying specific performance.
- The Pedersons filed a motion for reconsideration, which the trial court granted, issuing a new opinion requiring specific performance.
- The trial court entered a final judgment in favor of the Pedersons.
- Sioux Sound Co. appealed the judgment to the Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a real estate seller's failure to provide a perfectly clear title by the closing date justify the buyer's cancellation of the contract when the agreement contains a 'time is of the essence' clause but sets indefinite deadlines for full payment and deed delivery?
Opinions:
Majority - Henderson, Justice
No. A buyer cannot rescind a real estate contract due to a curable title defect when the contract's 'time is of the essence' clause is rendered ineffective by indefinite performance terms. The court reasoned that whether time is truly of the essence depends on the parties' intent and the contract's purpose, not merely a boilerplate clause. Here, the obligation to deliver the deed was tied to the full payment of the purchase price, which was an indefinite date. Because time was not of the essence, the Pedersons had a reasonable time to cure the title defect. A buyer may not rescind a contract while the seller is diligently and sincerely acting to perfect the title, which the Pedersons did by eventually securing a cancellation of the railroad's easement.
Concurring - Morgan, Justice
No. The concurring opinion agrees with the result because the ambiguity in the deadline for delivering the warranty deed rendered the 'time is of the essence' provision nugatory. The Pedersons demonstrated a willingness to resolve the title issues and successfully did so. However, this opinion disagrees with the majority's suggestion that the buyer was bound to accept the easement simply because the contract was 'subject to... easements of record,' arguing this position is contrary to the seller's primary obligation to furnish a good and merchantable title free of encumbrances.
Analysis:
This decision significantly tempers the power of boilerplate 'time is of the essence' clauses in real estate contracts. It establishes that for such a clause to be strictly enforced, the corresponding performance deadlines within the contract must be clear and definite. The ruling protects sellers from opportunistic buyers who might use minor, curable title defects as a pretext to withdraw from an agreement, especially when the contract's own terms create ambiguity. Future cases will likely require courts to look beyond the mere presence of the clause to determine the true intent of the parties regarding the strictness of performance dates.
Unlock the full brief for Pederson v. McGuire