Pearl M. Kennedy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33778, 804 F.2d 1332, 59 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1191 (1986)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
For purposes of making a qualified disclaimer to avoid gift tax, the transfer of a survivorship interest in a joint tenancy that is subject to unilateral partition under state law occurs at the death of a co-tenant, not at the creation of the tenancy.
Facts:
- In 1953, Pearl Kennedy and her husband Frank Kennedy acquired a family farm in Illinois as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
- Under Illinois law, either joint tenant possessed an unfettered right to partition the property at any time, which would have destroyed the right of survivorship.
- Frank Kennedy died in 1978.
- Upon Frank's death, his one-half interest in the farm passed to Pearl Kennedy by virtue of the right of survivorship.
- In 1979, Pearl Kennedy disclaimed the survivorship interest she had acquired from Frank.
- As a result of the disclaimer, the disclaimed interest passed to the Kennedys' daughter, Marsha, under Illinois law.
Procedural Posture:
- The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determined that Pearl Kennedy's disclaimer of her survivorship interest was a taxable gift to her daughter.
- Kennedy challenged the IRS's determination in the United States Tax Court.
- The Tax Court held for the IRS, ruling that the time for a qualified disclaimer began to run when the joint tenancy was created in 1953 and had long since expired.
- Kennedy, as the petitioner-appellant, appealed the Tax Court's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
For gift tax purposes, does the transfer of a survivorship interest in a joint tenancy that either co-tenant can unilaterally sever occur upon the death of a co-tenant, rather than at the creation of the tenancy?
Opinions:
Majority - Easterbrook
Yes. For gift tax purposes, the transfer of a survivorship interest in a partitionable joint tenancy occurs at the death of the co-tenant. The court reasoned that unlike the fixed future interests in Jewett v. CIR, a survivorship interest in a joint tenancy subject to partition is not indefeasibly fixed at its creation. Because either Frank or Pearl could have unilaterally severed the tenancy at will, Pearl's survivorship interest was not a completed transfer until Frank's power to partition was extinguished by his death. The court found that Frank's power to partition was analogous to a general power of appointment or the power to withdraw funds from a joint bank account, where the taxable transfer only occurs when the power lapses or is exercised. Therefore, the clock for Pearl to make a qualified disclaimer began running at Frank's death in 1978, making her 1979 disclaimer timely under the applicable statute.
Analysis:
This decision distinguishes the treatment of partitionable joint tenancies from other future interests, such as those in irrevocable trusts, for gift tax disclaimer purposes. It establishes that where a co-tenant's survivorship interest can be unilaterally defeated, the taxable 'transfer' does not occur until that interest becomes certain upon the death of the other tenant. This provides a crucial clarification for estate planning, allowing a surviving joint tenant a fresh window of time after a co-tenant's death to disclaim the inherited interest. The ruling aligns the tax treatment of these property interests with other revocable transfers, like joint bank accounts, creating a more consistent framework based on when an interest becomes irrevocable.
Unlock the full brief for Pearl M. Kennedy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue