Palestini v. General Dynamics Corporation
99 Cal. App. 4th 80, 120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 741, 67 Cal. Comp. Cases 754 (2002)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
California Labor Code section 3602, subdivision (b)(2) permits an employee to bring an action at law for damages against their employer, outside of the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act, if the employee's injury is aggravated by the employer's fraudulent concealment of the injury's existence and its connection with employment, with liability limited to damages proximately caused by the aggravation.
Facts:
- From March 1982 to June 1992, Louie Palestini worked as a plastics fabricator, group leadman, and supervisor at General Dynamics Corporation's manufacturing plants in San Diego.
- From June 1992 through January 1994, Louie Palestini continued in the same positions for Hughes Missile Systems Company.
- During his employment, Louie Palestini was continuously overexposed to identified solvents and other chemicals that defendants allegedly knew could be absorbed through the skin and cause cancer in various organs.
- Louie Palestini developed skin rashes and discoloration, which he reported to his supervisors at work.
- Louie Palestini and other employees inquired at work whether certain chemicals were safe for them to use and were repeatedly told the chemicals were safe and would not harm them.
- Defendants allegedly knew they were overexposing Louie Palestini to carcinogenic chemicals, knew the overexposure would probably cause damage, and knew his skin problems were precursors to cancer, but fraudulently concealed this information from him.
- As a result of his long-term chronic exposure, Louie Palestini contracted cancer.
- In October 1995, after his employment ended, Louie Palestini was diagnosed with testicular cancer and stage III metastasis, undergoing multiple surgeries and chemotherapy.
Procedural Posture:
- Louie Palestini filed a second amended complaint against General Dynamics Corporation and Hughes Missile Systems Company in a California trial court, asserting a cause of action under Labor Code section 3602(b)(2) for aggravation of work-related injuries by fraudulent concealment; Darla Palestini joined the lawsuit seeking loss of consortium damages.
- Hughes Missile Systems Company, joined by General Dynamics Corporation (defendants), filed a general demurrer to the fraudulent concealment cause of action, arguing it was barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act.
- The trial court sustained defendants' general demurrer to the Palestinis’ first cause of action (fraudulent concealment) without leave to amend, finding that the Palestinis failed to plead that defendants had actual prior knowledge of Louie Palestini’s injuries before he discovered them.
- The trial court subsequently entered judgments of dismissal of the entire action in favor of defendants.
- Louie and Darla Palestini (appellants) appealed the judgments of dismissal to the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a complaint sufficiently state a cause of action under California Labor Code section 3602(b)(2) for fraudulent concealment resulting in the aggravation of work-related injuries, when it generally alleges the employer knew of the employee's chronic overexposure to carcinogens and resulting skin damage, knew these were precursors to cancer, concealed this knowledge, and as a result, the employee's injuries were aggravated into metastatic cancer?
Opinions:
Majority - Nares, Acting P. J.
Yes, the Palestinis' second amended complaint sufficiently states a cause of action for fraudulent concealment resulting in aggravation of Louie Palestini’s work-related injuries within the meaning of Labor Code section 3602(b)(2). The court, guided by Foster v. Xerox Corp., determined that the complaint adequately pleaded the three essential elements for a Section 3602(b)(2) claim in "general terms." First, the Palestinis alleged that defendants knew Louie Palestini had suffered a work-related injury, specifically chronic overexposure to carcinogenic chemicals causing skin damage ("dermal barrier breakdown") and injurious absorption of toxins, and that his reported skin problems were precursors to cancer. Second, the complaint alleged that defendants concealed this knowledge, failing to inform Louie Palestini of his overexposure, the carcinogenic nature of the chemicals, and the causal link between his conditions and cancer, and actively misrepresented the chemicals as safe. Third, the pleading sufficiently alleged that Louie Palestini's injuries were aggravated by this concealment, as he was deprived of the opportunity to take precautions or seek alternative employment, leading to continued chronic exposure and the development of metastatic testicular cancer. The court emphasized that pleadings must be liberally construed and distinguished Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Superior Court because it involved a summary judgment on evidence, not the legal sufficiency of a complaint. The court also found support in Barth v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. and the foundational case Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior Court.
Analysis:
This case clarifies the pleading requirements for the fraudulent concealment exception to workers' compensation exclusivity, affirming that general allegations, rather than specific evidentiary facts, are sufficient to survive a demurrer. It emphasizes a liberal construction of pleadings, particularly in cases involving latent diseases like cancer where the full extent of injury or the precise physiological process may not be known immediately. The decision ensures that employees are not unduly barred from pursuing civil actions against employers who allegedly conceal known work-related dangers, thus expanding the scope for such claims at the initial litigation stage.
