Pack v. Santa Fe Minerals
869 P.2d 323, 1994 OK 23, 128 Oil & Gas Rep. 550 (1994)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
In Oklahoma, the term 'production' in an oil and gas lease's cessation of production clause means the well is capable of producing in paying quantities, not the actual marketing or sale of the product. A temporary cessation of marketing from a well that remains capable of production for reasonable business purposes does not trigger the clause to terminate the lease.
Facts:
- Mary Lou Pack and other mineral owners (lessors) entered into oil and gas leases with Santa Fe Minerals and other companies (lessees).
- The leases had primary terms of ten years, to be extended as long thereafter as oil or gas was 'produced.'
- The leases contained a 'cessation of production' clause stating the lease would terminate if production ceased for more than 60 days without the lessee resuming drilling operations.
- After the primary terms expired, the gas wells on the properties remained capable of producing in paying quantities at all times.
- Lessees intentionally stopped marketing gas from the wells for periods exceeding 60 days during the summer months when prices were lower.
- This marketing strategy was a common industry practice to maximize revenue by selling more gas during high-demand winter months while staying within annual production limits set by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
- During the summer months when marketing was curtailed, the wells were not profitable on a monthly basis.
Procedural Posture:
- Mary Lou Pack and other lessors filed quiet title actions against Santa Fe Minerals and other lessees in the district court (trial court).
- The trial court entered judgment in favor of the lessors, canceling the oil and gas leases.
- The lessees, as appellants, appealed the judgment to the Court of Appeals.
- The Court of Appeals, an intermediate appellate court, affirmed the trial court's judgment.
- The lessees successfully petitioned the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, the state's highest court, for a writ of certiorari to review the decision.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a lessee's temporary cessation of marketing gas from a well that remains capable of producing in paying quantities, for a period exceeding 60 days, constitute a 'cessation of production' under the lease's 60-day clause, thereby automatically terminating the lease?
Opinions:
Majority - Simms, Justice
No. A temporary cessation of marketing from a well that remains capable of producing in paying quantities does not constitute a 'cessation of production' that would terminate the lease. In Oklahoma oil and gas law, the term 'production' as used in both the habendum clause and the cessation of production clause means the well's capability to produce in paying quantities, not the actual marketing or sale of gas. The cessation of production clause is a savings provision intended to apply only when a well becomes physically incapable of producing, giving the lessee time to restore production or drill a new well. Interpreting 'production' to require constant marketing would create an internal conflict with the habendum clause (which only requires capability) and would render the shut-in royalty clause meaningless. The proper legal framework to analyze a failure to market is the implied covenant to market, which employs a 'reasonableness' standard, not the automatic termination of the cessation of production clause.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the 'capability' standard for 'production' in Oklahoma oil and gas leases, distinguishing it from the act of marketing. It provides lessees with greater operational flexibility, allowing them to make prudent marketing decisions based on market conditions without risking automatic forfeiture of the lease. The ruling clarifies that disputes over marketing delays are to be resolved under the more flexible 'reasonableness' test of the implied covenant to market, rather than the strict, automatic termination provision of a cessation of production clause. This protects lessees from harsh forfeitures while still obligating them to act with reasonable diligence in marketing the product over time.
